Is Eurotek Pro (W/11' DD) as deep as the At pro

[Pepa]

If you take away the water proof ability of the AT? How do these two compare?

 

[Mike Hillis]

Pepa, I just read all your posts. You have a ACE-250 that requires a big (BIG) coil to get deeper than 6" in your ground.

You need something with a manual ground balance.

HH
Mike

 

[Pepa]

Thanks for the reply Mike. I have been using the Ace since I started detecting (maybe 7-8 years) and I feel I have out grown it. I do have the 10 X 14 excelerator coil for the ace that goes deep. But it's so big that most places get masked. Also heavy.

 

[atomicscott]

I don't think that would be a fair question. The AT Pro ahs adjustable ground balance so you will be able to get the best available depth in varying ground conditions. I believe the Eurotek is preset GB so you won't get as consistently good depth at sites with different levels mineralization. I would imagine (like the F series Fishers) that the Eurotek would do very well in depth.

 

[Pepa]

Thanks atomicscott, I follow your logic with the ability to ground balance the at pro. I was hoping someone (Who has both) would chime in and give an opinion on how the two compare depth wise. Not necessarily in varying ground conditions. Maybe in a test garden...

 

[slingshot]

Different technologies-Something similar to Minelab on the AT.

 

[Robert2300]

Your trying to compare apples to oranges.
Robt2300

 

[Pepa]

Why is it apples to oranges? (Other than the waterproof factor)...Is the pro that much better? Can you explain. Thanks

 

[Robert2300]

Papa dude. Upgrade to the Ace 350 at 8kz.
Call Garrett and ask them what they will allow for a trade.
Robt2300

 

[markg]

I've had both, and in my ground they are neck and neck. Even though the ET doesn't have a GBing function it does quite well as long as you have the 11"DD coil.