Phillip_in_NM
Member
The more I use the MX5, the more I like it! But I couldn't see putting the old M6 out to pasture until I tested them both on some gold rings I had found earlier with the M6. In a nutshell, both did very well! I wouldn't say that one was better than the other in giving good indications of gold. It was a quick and dirty test, but at least I am sure now that I can hunt with the MX5 and not worry about missing gold I would have found with the M6.
It was also very interesting that the signals for the newly buried gold weren't anywhere near as stable as they were when I originally found them with the M6. There was a variation of perhaps as much as 10 or 12 in the VDI numbers of both machines, but the ranges were similar and centered around the same numbers on both the machines. In all but one of the 20 gold items I've dug with the m6, the very reason I dug it was because the VDI numbers were so rock solid regardless of swing direction.
I will post again when I test with my two gold nuggets.
It was also very interesting that the signals for the newly buried gold weren't anywhere near as stable as they were when I originally found them with the M6. There was a variation of perhaps as much as 10 or 12 in the VDI numbers of both machines, but the ranges were similar and centered around the same numbers on both the machines. In all but one of the 20 gold items I've dug with the m6, the very reason I dug it was because the VDI numbers were so rock solid regardless of swing direction.
I will post again when I test with my two gold nuggets.