Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Interesting Tek Omega performance results by NASA-Tom

blacktoe

New member
I got permission from NASA-TomTom to post this here. Looks like the DD coil is going to be a winner.

blacktoe

By NASA-Tom

For the past couple of months, I have extensively field-tested a new 11" x 7" DD coil for the Teknetics Omega. Some interesting discoveries. First; the primary area that I chose to hunt......... the non-ferrous targets of interest were approx in the 7" range. Several weeks ago, I hunted this area with the 9-3/4"
elliptical concentric coil. No non-ferrous targets were recovered. Although the Omega is capable of approx 10".... these targets were undetectable due to signal
attenuation from masking. A unusual loss in confidence ensued.
Fast forward--------- With the 11" DD coil installed, the Omega
became a measurably different unit. Suddenly, many non-ferrous targets
came to light. Even though this DD coil provides a approx 1" depth gain
on a high conductor Cu dime.... it placed the unit into a
"window-of-acceptability" for non-ferrous target acquisition in this
unique scenario. (Also, the Omega has multiple parallels to T2 platform). In bullet fashion:

* Disc '16' is the critical/pinnacle for max unmasking capabilities for the Omega..... as '21' is for the T2.... and '6' is for F75

* Fairly heavy EMI mitigated by sweeping coil in concert w/freq change

* Slightly better depth on high conductors vs. T2

* Slightly less depth on low conductors vs. T2

* Pinpoint delay is disconcerting..... for the first few moments of usage.

* Some elongated Fe targets are completely undetectable in ID mode with
no Disc & no notch. 90Deg turn...and Fe is then detectable. Undetermined (at this point) if this is a attribute...... or detriment.

* At first, the MP clock speed appears to be slow...... but Omega would
target-separate as well as T2

* MOST IMPORTANT: Omega is the industry forerunner for "stability"...
and the industry forerunner for "confidence" in Fe/iron nail infested areas. Although the unit is not as sensitive/deep as flagship F75..... this fatigueless
operating characteristic in iron is surreal. It is a dramatic departure from all others.
 
under "MOST IMPORTANT" is HUGE!!! And based on my field experience with the Omega while comparing it to my other detectors, I couldn't agree more.
 
NASA-Tom also stated in another posting on the Omega,

Quote from NASA-tom,

"The Omega can have some EMI issues, yet, with proper freq selection and sweeping the coil......... and the EMI almost always goes away. The problem with the Explorer is that it is (fairly) quiet in the iron..... TOO quiet. ,,, To the point of not being able to unmask non-ferrous targets in close proximity to iron. The Explorer is deeper than the Omega..... unless iron is near (which is more frequent than most folks realize)...... then the Omega will trump."

I want to make sure you guys know that I didn't write this and it is cut and paste. I also don't know NASA-Tom and asked permission to do this.

blacktoe
 
Top