Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Interesting on 2 silver neck chains that rang in at 12-17

diggervance

New member
You guys might find this as interesting as I did.

2 years ago I found a men's .925 Italy necklace that weighed in at 22 grams. Last week I found another on that weighed in at 17 grams.

Here is what I found interesting. They both rang in at 12-17 with a nickel tone, as a matter of fact the second one I found I was betting on it being gold because of the numbers and tone. I was floored when I seen it marked 925.

I just took them in to see if in fact they was fake and made of nickel. They both tested silver.

Even bunched up in a ball they still ring in at 12-17 with a nickel tone.
 
I've had the same experience, a silver chain bracelet giving a nickel sort of signal. The theory I've heard is that the machine is reading the individual links in the chain and not the chain as a solid lump of silver.
 
Thank You Bayard

very useful information

Diggervance
 
Yep the eTRAC 'can' struggle with silver and especially gold chains depending on a whole bunch of variables.
Its got something to do with multi frequency processing.

During an air test years ago, my ATPro could accurately ID a gold chain at depth. The eTRAC didn't see it at all....no matter what setting i used and i used em all.
I think the eTRAC sees individual links with adjacent links randomly canceling each other out confusing the eTRAC.
 
n/t
 
Bayard said:
I've had the same ...........................The theory I've heard is that the machine is reading the individual links in the chain and not the chain as a solid lump of silver.

********************************​
Bay...re .the theory; .....

The actual fact is, that a detector 'sums up' the the 'collective' responses of ALL the reactive materials in the search-field.

The amalgamation of each link's contributing signal, is comparable to the 'shout' from a group of people....

Most chain finds are due more to the thicker 'parts'...or additional 'charms'...rather than their randomly orientated links......Matt.
 
Top