Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

I'm off the hook ... for a while!

TobyH

New member
My wife has been wanting to find a nice anniversary ring with her 2500, and today she found it! :wiggle: But, instead of the big diamonds she wants, it has CZs. It IS gold, though (9ct). The center stone looks to be about 1ct and the 2 smaller ones probably 1/4ct each. It's even a very similar style setting to her engagement ring and makes a nice match with it's 1/2 ct diamond. It was found at a playground in the bark chips about 1" deep.
She also found a 1950 shilling, 1958 sixpence and 1943&1961 threepences - all within about 6" of each other at the base of a huge tree. She beat me today, but I'm still leading, overall. :starwars:
Together, we found $7.91 in decimal change. Not a bad day in the park, I'd say!
Toby
 
Congratulations to your wife for finding a gold ring. That is a beaut! But, like the rest of us, something deep down inside keeps us searching, searching, searching.....

Toby, it's your turn next:thumbup:
 
Nice haul. Hey, A CZ is just a man made diamond. Put them side by side and only a jeweler can tell the difference.

Bill
 
Yeah, until we got home, we were kinda taking bets as to whether or not they were real, although we both pretty much assumed the worst. Our gem tester confirmed - Not diamonds.
Now, she has it as inspiration for what the next "iffy" signal could uncover. She said this one was jumping around a bit and could've just as easily been a pulltab. Personally, I would have probably walked away from it. Maybe I should dig more, and walk less...
Toby
 
Top