Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

I am thinking of getting another detector... I have 2 excals [one with the old horseshoe coil] and a sov.. but...

Micheal_R

Moderator
Staff member
I have been checking out the goldquest aquasearch pulse. As of now, I live in fresh water areas. However, in one lake in particular, I have been finding a lot of old coins and rings.... they are deep however and pretty much at the extreme range of the excal. I have spent a couple of years at it and this lake is fairly clean of junk after that time. Would the aquasearch be worthwhile in these circumstances? Does it outperform say the infinium? or the Whiles? or any of the other pulse machines. Is it worth those extra dollars compared to the other pulse macines?

My intention is to one day, hopefully this year or next, purchase property in the Bahamas or Bermuda [or some such place .. Turks/ Caicos?]. I will still keep my farm up here but for the winters... ah well you get the idea.

Many thanks in advance.

Sunny skies

Mikie
 
Hey Mikie: I hear you about getting away from winter, it sucks big time as I recall.
I've got an Excal 1000, a CZ21 (10") and the Whites DF PI in my arsenal. The DF is the deepest but it does hit on everything and I'm never really sure if it is a junk signal or not so I wind up digging everything and much of it really deep. In a freshwater environment I think I would go crazy with the DF and if the Eric Foster units go deeper then I don't want to dig those targets. I'm pretty sure that Gulf Hunter had an Aquasearch, maybe he can expand on this reply.

Cheers Mate,

Eric

PS: I hope everyone is well at the ranch.
 
n/t
 
Hello Mikie, I guess the 1st thing you would want to do, is to take the Excal, set it to pinpoint and pretty much dig it all out there and see if you like doing that 1st, because that is what you are fixin' to be facing using the GQA2. I was not able to differentiate very well between targets using it, but nails and bobby pins would sometimes double beep, but so do broken rings, toe-rings, earrings and some chain, savvy? Of course, non-ferrous targets DO hit harder, no question, so maybe you can eventually become proficient at auditorily discriminating SOME. I would HIGHLY recommend that you order the unit from Mr.Bill with a center mounted 8" coil though, DO NOT order the 11", as it is VERY difficult to pinpoint using it AND it will not run with stability, at least here where I am at 10uS, as advertised. It DID run stable with the 8" though. The major advantage to using a GQA2 to begin with was the fact that it actually had the 10uS feature available, for the extra sensitivity to fine gold. Actually, I've found finer pieces of gold using my Excal, LOL! I dug some bobby pins that sounded pretty darn good WAY DOWN there, LOL! I don't think there is a better performer on a sumersible PI, currently available. At the time I bought mine, the option was not available to stem mount the control housing, I assume it is still the same. I would NOT recommend that you hip mount the control housing, as they suggest though, as I had an issue. Water hunting is too volatile of an environment to hip mount, imo. I ended up getting spooked one night in the surf, when I spooked a school of baitfish. When I jumped, I stepped onto the coil wire and ripped it out of the control housing, Mr.Bill repaired it at a reduced rate, but it DID cost me, as it was not a defect, but the fact remains that it is a bad idea NOT having your control housing secured to the shaft, with the coil wire wrapped and taped in place. This is not the only unit I've had issues with catastrophe taking it's toll in the surf. NOW, everyone of my units are mounted to the control housing and no more issues. The unit has been sold to a mate in Fla and the last I heard, he had already pulled enough gold to cover the cost of admission, savvy? I guess what I'm trying to say is, the unit is capable, get ready for more work out there and it is fragile, be careful. I used Garrett Mark II control housing brackets that another mate modified to mount the control housing to the stem and it was fine, no more worries.
 
I am not unhappy with the excal. In fact, even the old horseshoe coil one had NEVER given me a lick of grief. Steady as a rock and dependable. But, I have never separated the electronics from the shaft. In all of my units, I have mounted the control box on the shaft. Mind you, I hate the minelab shaft so I made my own [one of the advantages of being a machinist/welder.... love that TIG capability]

Again, my thanks

Micheal
 
I figured GH would jump in with some good advice. I don't recall Max having that unit but he's had pretty much every type of detector you can think of out for a spin so maybe I'm mistaken. Sorry to hear about the Great White North experience you've been through this winter, definitely been a rough one.

Kewl,

Eric
 
OH YEAH, Max had one(circa '03), haven't you ever seen that pic of Max's, where he dug a hole about 2' deep & 4' wide to recover a tent stake or whatever? He did not like it! Come on Max, lets see it!
 
wouldn't use anything else. I have 2 of them 1 older1 tuned by Mr Bill and a stock 1 as a back up . when I use a PI I know I didn't leave anything behind that could be found in my path. As far as digging junk it don't bother me one way or the other. I find small gold and silver chains others miss so it is worth the trouble
.........and thats my opinion :detecting::smoke:

fieldboy se va
 
Top