Have you answered the man's question yet? My above post says I have owned two. I had one that went to Fisher 3 times and came back with "nothing" wrong. When I asked questions about it, I was accused of being too stupid and stubborn to operate it (but just barely smart enough to operate my EXII I suppose). I sold it! I swung another individuals F75 a few months later and it was an entirely different machine. Based on that, I picked one up used. It's very different. There are a few places where you can speak more frankly about these things than Findmall - and this thread is an example of why.
My point? Well brother, you based your opinion of Fisher's quality control - in relation to Paul's question, which was a request for advice on how to tell the difference between two possibly different manufacturing runs of a detector - on Fisher's warranty. Then you used that warranty to make an argument that there can be no quality control issues with these detectors. And I'm diverting the discussion? This was all said regardless of known issue with this one and known issue with previous models. Different runs can produce different detectors.
Jim said:
statistics is "ENTIRELY" all about profit
Booooo! You misquoted me to make a different argument :sad: (and then said I was doing the bait-and-switch game in the argument....
)
Statistical analysis of your product
to determine an appropriate warranty length is based on profit. No business could offer you a lengthy warranty (especially on a device designed to be rubbed on the ground, thrown in the back of a truck, etc.) based on a statistical analysis that did not have profitability at the top of the equation. For example, you can take two pieces of similarly graded steel and make them into the same size wrench ONE will sell at Wally's with a Stanley name and have no warranty. The other will be stamped Craft5man, be marked up 40% and have a lifetime warranty. A statistical analysis of the failure rate of the two wrenches will present no difference, but the one has a lifetime warranty. The warranty proved nothing other than you were willing to shell out money for false peace of mind.. It certainly didn't tell you that one was better than the other.
If I had to guess (and I have no idea if I'm correct - but I bet I'm close), I'd say the manufacturer can replace the one circuit board or the coil in these detectors 4 or 5 times before the profit margin is gone.
Back to Paul from Kiev: The difference in my two as I was trying to say early in the thread was stability or as some have described "susceptibility to EMI". I'd crank them all up and see which is b1tching at you the least. Good luck Paul.
This all reminds me of a hilarious scene in Tommy Boy where Chris Farley is discussing a Guarantee stamped on a box. LOL. Those of you that have seen it will get a smile remembering it