Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

How many of you can't tell that you had a silver coin under your coil being 100% sure

And be 100 percent sure.....NOBODY, and anyone who says they can should sell detectors, but of course, only that one detector. Too many ground, target, depth, and position factors. Of course as always...JMHO.
 
n/t
 
If there was a detector made that could 100% positively identify a silver coin or gold that would be the detector to buy! If such a detector existed there would be no use for any other metal detectors. Unfortunately no detector or detector user can know 100% until the item is dug.

Justin
 
Well here is the best I send it done (once)
Me and my brother Ron were out on a hunt, we were both using top of the line Teknetics detectors,
his was the Mark I
and mine was the 9000/B
this was in the mid 80's.
He's ID'in and pinpointing a target and then he calls me over and says "this should be a silver dime, check it and see what you get" So, I give it a few swings and I told him that its not a dime, if its a coin its a silver quarter!
He dug it and it was a silver quarter.

100% of the time isn't possible, not even 25% of the time. But, they're many times when things are right that you get that feeling to call it a silver coin.

I just remembered another time I called it right.
I was out with a friend (co-worker) and he was considering buying my Whites 5000 DI series 2 (no ID meter) (earlier 80's) so I had him out in a place where I had been hunting and had a real good feel for certain targets, so I'm hunting and I get this target response that was faint, but very clean, the faster I swept over it the better It sounded. So, I'm explaining to him what's happening and then I made a call, I said, "From the sound of this one it should be a penny and its should be in the 40's or older" I dug it and it was a penny in the 40's LoL.
He bought the detector. But the only reason I called that one right was because I knew the area, I knew what had been coming out of the ground, the sound was faint, clean and crisp, I knew it could have been a dime, but those 40's pennies were the most more common.

Mark
 
Just can't be done, too many variables. I have had worn seated dimes ID as Indian head cents.
 
With my Explorer the only thing I am sure of, is that it's a coin most of the time. If I knew which ones were silver I would'nt end up with $100 in clad every year. :laugh:
 
you cant thats why i like the simple detectors, it is fine if i know Iron non iron , somtimes a small pice of Iron next to a silver coin will lower the VDI number and fool you , somtimes you thing humm its 89 and turns out to be a pop can. out technology is very old school at this time . the upcoming future detector will be able to get a silver half dime at 20" deep even if an ax head is over it and tell you the alloy heat date, deformation date and bring up the image on color on a screenand tell you exactly how deep it is you will be able to set the detector to find silver and gold only of the disired wight and it will not use a VLF or PI it will be somthing els, but its going to coast 20.000 $
 
Approximately 6-7 years ago, Lost Treasure (I believe) had an article with the pic of a fabulous metal detector with TV screen. On the screen was an image of a beer can with a 1918 silver dime next to it and the article noted that you could even read the date! It was in their April 1st copy..
 
:rofl: April 1st issue?
 
dont laugh guys , rember they did not beleive the wright brothers could fly. and who ever would think we could go to the moon. Iam telling you the VLF and PI machine are caveman stuff , compared to whats coming
 
I do very poorly at it . I dig a lot of rusty iron with my Explorer SE but I do noticeably better with the Explorer 2 .
 
100 per cent, no. Some of the Time, yes.
BB
 
n/t
 
The resolution in conductivity between various clads, copper pennies, and silver dimes and quarters as well as large cents is rather close. There is a fine line between them in conductivity distinction, so that I never trusted what the machine thought it was on various detectors I owned that could make slight distinctions between them. Silver can and will read like "clads" or pennies due to dry conditions, being worn badly, on edge, masking, depth, or minerals. I've had sites where to the extreme a silver dime would ID as a much lower zinc ID than a copper penny. I've dug worn silver dimes that read like copper pennies. I've dug silver on edge or deep or masked by junk or minerals that read like clads, or even that sounded bad and I was sure was going to be a rusty old bottle cap on some machines.

When I'm old coin hunting, the only coin I really care about avoiding is zincs when there are billions at a site and I'm in the mood to avoid them, which read a good it further down in conductivity than most copper or bronze based pennies (not all, like fatty indians containing nickel which make then read even past zincs and into the tab range). Size of the silver coin can also cause it to read lower. A silver 3 cent piece reads as a zinc if memory serves without refreshing my memory looking at my ID chart. Half dimes probably at least as low as a wheat and probably down to the zinc range maybe.

When I'm after old coins, and the site has been pounded, and I'm in the mood to be picky- I'll only dig two types of coins....If they are deep, say 7" or more and thus perhaps beyond the reach of other machines in my mineralized soils, or beyond the reach of the particular coil they were using. Or, I will go after shallow coin hits too, but only if they are masked somewhat by trash to make me think they could perhaps be an old coin that others missed due to the masking. In those two cases (depth or masking), I will dig any "zinc" signal too.

The resolution is so fine on various high end of the scale coin types that it can make an ID floaty or jumpy, which can talk me out of digging a coin if I think it's trash by the ID instability. Yes, audio is king, but a VDI can convince you not to dig if you're tired or being particular that day, and that can cost you some nice coin finds. Primarily, besides going by the above deep or masked rules when after old coins at "dead" sites, if the audio hints to a sweet high silver tone I'll ignore whatever the VDI is trying to tell me and dig. Audio is by far the most reliable way to judge what is dig worthy, but just the same the VDI can offer valuable insight as well in certain situations, such as how false coin hits from iron tend to jump around randomly, where as a deep or masked coin might make a more steady less random climb in VDI to the coin range.

In a sense, there is an old saying that a bigger net catches more fish, so by way of having a larger "coin" ID that most coins fall under, at depth or in masking it may be easier to see what could be a coin, and not have the VDI trying to talk you out of it.

The only time I really care about splitting hairs on targets is with low and mid conductors, from foil up to tabs and with nickels in between. With a very high resolution in this low to mid range just below zinc pennies, I often find it useful to avoid a billion tabs at a site while doing after nickels or potential gold rings or buttons, and even after certain old odd coins that are supposed to read that low on the scale. Then I find it useful to split hairs and note VDI numbers of stuff. With such high conductivity resolution in this range, my nickel count has gone way up, since they ID distinctly below round and square tabs, and also well above most forms of foil or can shard trash. That's where I want to avoid a bunch of junk on particular days I'm being picky about things, and try to slant the odds in my favor by avoiding very common trash numbers present at a site.

There is also a gap, between the highest tab # and the lowest zinc penny #, where about a 3 digit VDI span is a "dead zone" of targets I rarely see, so I always dig those odd in between numbers when I come across them, hoping for a gold ring or some other good find, and often I have got some cool relics that way.

Summary on being able to tell silver from clads- Yes, with a good machine you can often tell a slighter "sweetness" or higher pitch to what should be silver, or say how fast the ID jumps up to "COIN" without as much wiggle work too, but just the same avoiding what you suspect is say a wheat while digging only silver is very risky. I often run across sites where it's obvious all the silver has been cherry picked, and will dig say 10 to 20 wheats in a few hours time with ease. I always smile when that happens, because I know very well they are passing some silvers that read just like a wheat or even lower for some odd reason. Not too mention any silvers dropped with those wheats that might be under them, because the detection field is only going to see the first metal object in the field unless they are at the same depth or such for the most part.

When a site is beyond dead, that's when I come back and work it from odd diagnal angles, and dig any iffy coin hit no matter how bad it nulls or sounds from other angles. Badly masked coins might not be seen unless hit from those quirky odd gridding angles human nature never does. People always grid parallel or 90 degrees to landmarks such as sidewalks, and even if they don't most people won't dig iffy coin hits, thinking they know better as to what is dig worthy. No machine, no matter how much technology crammed in the box, can make badly masked or mineralized conditions make all coins sound perfect. The trick is to lower your standards when a site is beyond "dead". If most will dig an iffy coin hit that is at least 75 or 80% "there", there lower your standards to say 30 to 40% "coin" and watch the finds pop out like magic...
 
The only true 100% accurate discriminator is a shovel. No way can anyone tell you it's silver 100% of the time. I' real luck just do dig a silver once a month.
 
in the 80s,the parks were litterd with silver coins so guessing you have a silver quarter under your coil wouldnt be so hard,i did it yesterday with a 1947 s quarter but i dint guess the date!:wiggle:
 
Top