IDXMonster
Well-known member
Setting aside the issue of durability...focusing STRICTLY on sound quality....Using a set of newer Auvio "on ear" headphones, it seemed to me that there is a dimension to the audio on my Explorer2 that cannot be reproduced via my Killer Bs. It is as though the sound card in the EX2 is very "musical",the sounds have depth,layering...whatever it is,the Killer Bs don't have that kind of smoothness and range. Now...I've never USED the original headphones an Explorer came with,so I don't know the manufacturers intent with how the user is supposed to hear the signals. Being a semi-pro musician I do relate to things with a musical quality,and these Auvios really brought out a dimension to this machine that I'd really like to explore. I've used crappy Calrads,the Killer Bs and now the Auvios. I understand and can work around ALL of the other issues of using Hi-Fi headphones with a metal detector,I understand the downfalls completely,really. Who is using musical headphones with this musical machine? Do you find the tonal representations to be more informative with Hi-Fi? I certainly do!!
On the same "note"...I would suggest Explorer users at least plug in a set of Hi-Fi headphones just to hear the difference between them and your "detector" phones,if you haven't "gone there" already. It's pretty cool,even if you're not going out in the field with them.
On the same "note"...I would suggest Explorer users at least plug in a set of Hi-Fi headphones just to hear the difference between them and your "detector" phones,if you haven't "gone there" already. It's pretty cool,even if you're not going out in the field with them.