Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Has there been an ExI vs ExII comparison yet?

A

Anonymous

Guest
I've seen a few posts describing the operation of the Explorer II, but other than the cosmetic changes, the ferrous/conductive screen change and hearing how the cursor does a better job following the tones, I'm still looking for something to get a handle on the differences in operation. I guess the main thing I'm interesting in knowing is whether the tones are still the same. Does the quicker processor mainly help to move that cursor around the screen (not necessarily to quicken up the sounds which might not need much more "processing" and which are almost too fast for me to follow sometimes anyways). If I'm a copper/silver coin hunter and use IM -16 or close to it, does a quicker processor make a difference? Does it help with target separation? For instance, if I'm in ferrous mode and the cursor on my EX I dinosaur is plodding around the left part of the screen but the tones are high I'll probably dig it anyways. If the quicker processor mostly benefits people who use discrimation patterns then I can see how this could help finding more gold amongst the pulltabs. Thanks.
 
Top