John 'n' W.Va
Active member
I know there are a lot of variables. I was told to buy a MXT or a X-Terra 70 for my type of hunting two years ago. I do a mixed type of MD'ing. I got lied off from my job and it was almost two years till I had steady full time work. That gave me a long time to check out both detectors.
In my opinion the MXT was too heavy and had no depth. I didn't like the battery set up. A buddy of mine in Fl. had a MXT and I actually got a hit on a cent that he couldn't pick up on with my Ace 250. I moved to WV. and many people told me MXT's doesn't work well here. I found that hard to believe, since they work well in the gold fields. I didn't have the money to chance buying one and not have it work for me. They seem to be built well.
People always talk this is better or that one is better, even if it is a dog. I heard the X-Terra 70 wasn't built that well and again didn't have the depth I wanted. I don't like swinging slow. I didn't like them not having a small coil. It was more expensive and I was worried about the customer service.
Among the crowds I heard Fisher was a good detector. There seemed to be something missing with Fisher. User friendly, up to date or having a detector for my needs. I didn't know what it was. I was also worried when they got bought out that the quality would still be there.
I am glad that I waited two years. When Fisher came out with the F-70 I had found my detector. Fact: It is less costly than the others, lighter, inexpensive to operate.
It has the depth I needed to relic hunt. It separates well in trashy areas. It does work well in WV's soil. I do a little prospecting when I visit my sister in NC. I haven't use it for that, but it will happen. I have been prospecting for 20 years and I know the area better than many locals.
I'm a little tight with my money and do a lot of shopping around. I feel I have done well by choosing the F-70. I have respect for the other detectors and know the operater is an important component. They seem to be in the same class of detectors. How do you think the others compare? Have you used them? Anything I said seemed not true?
In my opinion the MXT was too heavy and had no depth. I didn't like the battery set up. A buddy of mine in Fl. had a MXT and I actually got a hit on a cent that he couldn't pick up on with my Ace 250. I moved to WV. and many people told me MXT's doesn't work well here. I found that hard to believe, since they work well in the gold fields. I didn't have the money to chance buying one and not have it work for me. They seem to be built well.
People always talk this is better or that one is better, even if it is a dog. I heard the X-Terra 70 wasn't built that well and again didn't have the depth I wanted. I don't like swinging slow. I didn't like them not having a small coil. It was more expensive and I was worried about the customer service.
Among the crowds I heard Fisher was a good detector. There seemed to be something missing with Fisher. User friendly, up to date or having a detector for my needs. I didn't know what it was. I was also worried when they got bought out that the quality would still be there.
I am glad that I waited two years. When Fisher came out with the F-70 I had found my detector. Fact: It is less costly than the others, lighter, inexpensive to operate.
It has the depth I needed to relic hunt. It separates well in trashy areas. It does work well in WV's soil. I do a little prospecting when I visit my sister in NC. I haven't use it for that, but it will happen. I have been prospecting for 20 years and I know the area better than many locals.
I'm a little tight with my money and do a lot of shopping around. I feel I have done well by choosing the F-70. I have respect for the other detectors and know the operater is an important component. They seem to be in the same class of detectors. How do you think the others compare? Have you used them? Anything I said seemed not true?