I gotta agree with Dan-Pa. If youre gonna hunt for nuggets, then a detector set up to do that should be had.
However, the relevance to this line of thought, IMHO, is when it comes to small gold jewelry. I suggest that is what should be used to determine the limits of the 1350 - as it most likely to be employed in the seach for such things.
Since jewelry grade gold is alloyed with other metals, mostly copper, won't it behave differently than pure naturally occurring gold nuggets, anyway?
What will the 1350 do on small 10K stud earrings and little filligree gold doodads or <FONT COLOR="#ff0000">CHAINS</FONT>, as are so often lost (Im gonna discount rings for the moment as they are inherently inductive and create a greater response by virtue of that factor)?
I have just received a new-to-me 1350 <img src="/metal/html/biggrin.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt="
"> and all this and any talk of it's performance is of great interest to me.
Thanks for all the great commentary and opinion.
david