thought my wife was ready to swap her xlt for the Gtp1350 but she now has the idea the 1500 is a better machine (from what I have read they both do the same thing except one gives true depth and imagaineing is this worth 100.00 more) all help will be welcome. Also am I right in saying either one can be sweept slower than her xlt, thanks for any info.:?
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
gti1500 over gtp1350
- Thread starter littleman
- Start date
Both detectors give accurate depth. The GTP 1350 weighs 4 LBS, the GTI 1500 weighs 4.1 LBS. They each use different technology to size a coin. The GTI uses a non-motion sizing technique with 5 different sizes. The GTP 1350 uses a motion technique (you need to swing the coil back and forth over the target) and has only 3 sizes. Both machines seem to be equal in depth. They are both excellent machines for coin hunting.:yo
A
Anonymous
Guest
John answered part of your question, I'll take on the rest. The GTi's adjust to whatever swing speed employed and can be swept at any speed from nearly non-motion to fast. The little 250 is exceptional in this department. You can't swing it fast enough to miss a target.
Bill
Bill
A
Anonymous
Guest
Yeah the GTI's automatically adjust to each individual's scanning speed and they automatically adjust to ground conditions as you scan. They are a tough machine to beat.
Bill
Bill
A
Anonymous
Guest
i had a 1500 and now use a 1350, wish i would have kept the 1500. the 1350 is good, but the 1500 was way better and easier to use.....i dont like the way you have to keep screwing with the profiling button....my $.o2 Mike
A
Anonymous
Guest
Since aside from the fact one has profiling and the other imaging they are the same identical detector, why would one be any easier to use than the other? Just click the profiling off.
Bill
Bill
A
Anonymous
Guest
that is the problem, i keep having to turn the profiling off, everytime you pinpoint something, the profiling is turned on again. then you have to turn it off. it does not detect the same to me with profiling on compared to how it detects with it off....