Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Gold Bug Pro Audio Question

gsitexas

Member
I am trying to confirm the similarities between the Gold Bug Pro and G2 audio.

It is my understanding the Teknetics G2 audio provides a modulated and sharp audio response for targets down to approximately 6" in depth and a VCO audio response on deeper items.

Does the Gold Bug Pro have this exact same audio characteristic or does it have VCO tone for all targets regardless of depth?

Thank you,

Keith
 
Its my understanding that GB Pro and G2 are the exactly same works buy in different name and looks etc only.
 
gsitexas said:
I am trying to confirm the similarities between the Gold Bug Pro and G2 audio.
The Fisher Gold Bug Pro and Teknetics G2 use the same circuitry. The only differences are the rod design and push button design.


gsitexas said:
It is my understanding the Teknetics G2 audio provides a modulated and sharp audio response for targets down to approximately 6" in depth and a VCO audio response on deeper items.

Does the Gold Bug Pro have this exact same audio characteristic or does it have VCO tone for all targets regardless of depth?
Since the Gold Bug Pro and G2 use the same electronic platform, they work the same. Part of the difference in audio response is going to be with the operator's ability to distinguish pitch change (VCO) on mid-depth or deeper targets. Both will produce a nice modulated audio that is more distinguishable as coil-to-target distance increases, but I know some users who can mainly hear (or be attentive to) the VCO changes on the shallower, close-proximity targets.

There is a more noticeable or "sharp" response in the VCO on shallower targets, especially to about 4"
 
Top