Garrett counter to ctx3030?

[Mudbath86]

Does anyone else think that Garrett will have a new machine out by next year to counter the ctx3030? Surely they couldn't afford not to?

 

[MikeLab]

All thay have to do is take the AT Pro or AT Gold and add about three pounds of useless weight to it. And raise the price four times.

 

[BigCatDaddy]

Kinda cost prohibitive for most detectorists. For $3000, the thing better kiss me goodnight and make me coffee in the morning!!

 

[GoGoGopher]

Better do more than kiss me...It better lay golden eggs!

HH,

 

[Justin E]

Of course, who says Garrett should try to take on the CTX3030? Too soon to tell if it's going to be all that great. I do believe they should try to take on the ETRAC. A lighter, imaging detector with 3 or 4 frequencies and the fine tune ability of a V3i. Would be nice.

 

[Mick in Dubbo]

The 3030 looks like it'll be a good detector (already own an Explorer though) but personally, I'd prefer to buy an AT Pro. Although I'm in the process of buying another non Garrett detector, I think that the AT will be my next purchase. I was very impressed with it when I used it and it doesn't weigh a tone either.
Mick Evans.

 

[usa-usn-vet]

THIS MACHINE FOR THE MONEY SHOULD LAY GOLDEN EGGS WITH SILVER YOLKS.

 

[widebody]

[size=large]i go with bcd. not asking much. i have learned to accept the machine that will find the treasures in my area and that ain't much. selling all my machines except the ATP.

HH[/size]

 

[outdoors]

muti- frequency machine like the explorer and etrac (my explorer works great going from dry sand right into wet sand with no problem at the beach with the salt water)

 

[Salida]

For $3000 the machine better do alot more than find coins and gold! But then what else is there? -)

 

[Salida]

The ctx3030 is MineLabs answer to Whites Spectra V3