Okay, I know pitting two detectors against each other and asking for opinions on which is "better" is a haphazard thing to do, but here goes. I'm looking to upgrade from a bounty hunter unit (fun machine, but I'm ready for something more serious). I've narrowed my search down to these two units. I've read a number of reviews of both, though I rarely see them compared directly (probably since the AT Pro hasn't been on the market so long). I intend to use whatever I buy to search primarily for older coins and jewelry in soil with a fairly high iron content, and occasionally on the beach. In terms of performance (specifically depth and ability to handle mineralization), which is better and by how much? I would particularly appreciate the advice of anyone who has used both machines. Thanks in advance!
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
Garrett AT Pro vs. Fisher F70
- Thread starter abcoin
- Start date