Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Field Test of Teknetics T2 Been PULLED everywhere???? To whom it may concern....

K

KCK

New member
You know if a person testifies with spoken words:crylol:...has he or she not testified of their self and of thier knowledge?:wave: Field tests were directed and written and documented.:nerd: The words of the field tester were their measured spoken words about their experience with a product.:beers:

Why would anyone need to take this given public posted knowledge away?:surprised:

Since the person decided to speak it? Or to publicly make write of it... does it not become public knowledge?:angry: Those spoken or written words have also become public ownership haven't they, for the public to use as they direct that knowledge given to them, as they please, so long as it is not used to slander.

If you are a witness of an account (Field Tester)... and you state your experience with a particular product, then you decide to take it all back... You may as well be called a "Story Teller"!:ban:

And That's the truth! Sorry for the rant. But when I seen the Field Tests Pulled...Field Test 1...Field Test 2... all respect and belief in what I had read vanished with it, as well as the trust in the Tester.
I guess I'm one who believes in right and wrong, have I always been right ...no sir, but I don't hold the postition that needs to be beyond reproach as a Field Tester holds. It must be a respect thing!

Ted/KCK@wowway.com
Columbus, Ohio
 
The originator of the original post has the option, (just like you do), to edit their post. If they so choose to edit it to the point of removing all typed matter, it
 
I agree to their right to pull, edit in any manner, change their mind even. What I am saying is. If you don't want what you say to be used in the public fair, don't say it in the first place, That's all, no sin committed.

I own my house, but I don't have the right to burn it down!

Words affect others....and if you choose to be public your words ...each and everyone of them does matter.

No foul....KCK
 
They were full of great information, both good and bad about the T2. I am glad I was able to read them before they went away. The testers put a lot of work into them and I appreciated their input.:clapping:

Now we have other reports being filed and all information is helpful.
Keep up the good work and let those who spend the time to share their knowledge and techniques with everyone know how much you appreciate them.

Remember it is their experience in their area and also their opinion and results based on the time spent with the detector.

HH

Don
 
You used the word "testers" as in more than one.

I am only aware of one poster, who was not a tester, but did post his results using the T-2, he removed his post.

Were they others ??

Mr. Bill
 
Trouble with the written word I guess it has no feeling in it! I meant the person who posted the review was reviewing his tests with the machine, as though he was the one testing it, as in Tester, only without a Graduate's Certified Degree ....sorry for stepping on Real Toes , didn't mean to but I understand how it did sound that way!

KCK

Testers means anyone with a Tek T2 that will share infomation ...as in the following.......This is what I meant by Testers...

Teknetics T2 Awesome machine
 
Sorry, only speaking in general terms.
 
Not all of us users are searching for the same thing or the same thing in a machine. There isn't a perfect machine in most opinions. The very things that some are looking for may not be what another needs. In reading field tests consider the length of experience of the tester with the machine. If a machine hasn't been out long; a tester may change his opinion after more experience. That is a possible reason for the withdrawal of test results. I don't do much hunting but have used the machine and to me it excels in some areas and some areas I didn't look at very well. HH
 
Thanks Ted, for grouping all those comments together in one place. It'll help a lot of people who don't have the time to read back a number of pages.

It's too late, for an active forum such as this, to recover any of the deleted posts, but Google routinely performs archives of many popular websites. Just do a search for the domain name, then select Google's archive of the site. There's also www.waybackmachine.org. Much of what is written on the net is indeed archived somewhere.

hh-Ed
 
Good information that I was not aware of. Thanks.
 
Ted, Appreciate your re-posting all of those posts. Like you I save most everything I can relating to anything that may interest me for later use/comparison with my findings. For the life of me I have no idea who y'all may be talking about regarding pulling off posts, but to me I would have to agree with Bill in that if the person that wrote it wants to take it off, then by all means have at it! I know that My initial field test if you want to call it that is still there as well as on my own web site for all to read. I am in no way a TESTER and all that I share are just my opinions. I do feel I have a breath of knowledge after having been detecting for a little over 30yrs now and having used most types on the market at one time or another. I write these posts to share with other my own experiences and hunts. I enjoy doing so and by doing so I hope that others will learn from what I have learned. I know that whatever I say about any product is my own opinions and may/may not be shared by others but all that is ok too since it makes for better threads in my opinion...there's that word again! :yikes:

Anyway, I just wanted to say thanks for re-posting the posts, I see where I missed a few. ;)
 
If the house is not mortgaged, then you have every "right" to burn it down if you want to.

Just don't try to file an insurance claim when you're done.....and maybe expect a visit from the local fire marshall and a citation or two for "reckless burning" or some such nonsense.

:lol:

Ralph
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top