Ferrous-Conductivity readings for Non-Ferrous targets

[Digger]

Revisiting the rationale behind evolving the Explorer FE/CO discrimination method into the one used in E-TRAC and CTX 3030

http://www.minelab.com/usa/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/ferrous-conductivity-readings-for-non-ferrous-targets

 

[trojdor]

Randy,
That was an interesting read...
Thanks,

Mike

 

[sube]

Thanks digger now we know why they use the 12 line. sube

 

[CT Todd]

Interesting read. I've owned all of those machines. When CTX2 comes out or whatever it maybe called. I'd just love to get back to the TID of an Etrac with everything else CTX

 

[amberjack]

all 3 are different on how the FE numbers work and all have their pluses and minuses that's just from my experience nothing is perfect and so grab the right tool for the job

AJ

 

[Search and recovery]

A good read and explanation of how the machines are configured. Thanks.

 

[IDXMonster]

Interesting read. I've owned all of those machines. When CTX2 comes out or whatever it maybe called. I'd just love to get back to the TID of an Etrac with everything else CTX

Yeah...I typed something kinda similar about an Explorer but I guess I didn't post it or something...if I had the CTX with the Explorer2 audio and "non 12 line" I'd be quite happy. Hell,I'm quite happy now,I love my CTX AND Explorer2. I wonder how much can be manipulated through updates before it's not a CTX anymore....or if it's even possible for it to emulate an etrac or Explorer regarding the TID...or,for ME,the audio.