I used the reverse discrimination back in the 70's, when the first VLF/TR machines were introduced. The TR mode was discrimination and the VLF (at that time) did not discriminate. VLF would hunt much deeper than TR. I'd hunt in VLF, and when I got a signal, I'd switch over to TR. Whether it was good or bad, it was too deep for the TR mode to detect and/or identify. Tuning the coil to the ground, if the TR signal did not tell me it was trash, I'd dig. Similar to your experience with rings, I dug a ton of coins using this method. With the advent of discriminating VLF, there may not be as good of a reason to hunt this way. However, since we now have tones to help identify ferrous or conductive properties, I still like to hunt with minimal discrimination and verify with another Pattern having more discrimination. But in my opinion, unless a detector has a true all metal mode, I see no difference in depth when comparing an open mode with an ample amount of rejection. Just less audio to decipher, in the latter case. JMHO HH Randy