Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

FBS and BBS or Multiple Frequency Technology (Technical_

A

Anonymous

Guest
If we visualize an 8 X 10 sheet of paper with lines so that there are 50 horizontal lines on the page. If we put a bb or less sized target on the page it may be over a line or between two lines. The more lines there are the greater the chance that the bb will be over a line. Keep doubling the lines and the more lines the bb will be over. Consider that we want the bb to be over as many lines as we can within limits. The limit being how many lines can be drawn on the page in this example.
This illustrates a major advantage of FBS and BBS technology and one reason why frequency is important. The high frequencies have tighter line spacing so of the electromagnetic field from the TX coil so is more sensitivity to smaller targets but penetrates the soil at less depth. The low frequencies flux lines are not a tightly spaced BUT penetrate the soil deepest. So with 28 or 17 frequencies components in the electromagnetic flux we get the best OVERALL sensitivity to small targets and depth. We end up with a best depth and sensitivity at frequencies below 100khz so that is our upper limit for hobby detectors.
The more lines of flux that penetrate a target the greater are the eddy currents that are induced into the target. When eddy currents flow in the target they generate their own electromagnetic field. That electromagnetic field stores enegry just as there is enrgy in the filed from the TX coil. Energy can be moved from one point to another using an electromagnetic filed. What we want to do is move the coil in such so that the maximum number of lines of force strike a metal target. The hot strip down the center of the coil is where the flux lines are the tightest so maximum inductance of eddy current flow in the target occur.
There are lines of flux or force around the detection coil. The further from the hot strip you are the less lines of force strike a target. A large metal target has more conductance than a smaller one. The conductivity of the two targets is the same no matter what the size of the metal as long as they are the same metal. The targets on the edges of the detection flux can warp the detection field. We want a large footprint to cover enough ground so that we don
 
Cody,
I really enjoy your contribution to this Forum. Being an engineer, I enjoy readiing about the tecnical issues of our hobby. It helps me understand what I am doing while detecting.
Thanks,
Kalvin
 
Jump in often and anytime. You understand the interest ones has in the technology and it is nice to be able to connect that to the hobby.
HH, Cody
 
Good to see you Jackpine, what are you up to now days?
I enjoy your posts and comments. Glad you agree about the coil. We could write page after page on how the electronics works and how targets respond depending on the alloy or precious metals but when it all said and done I don't think it makes a lot of difference. My guess is most users just wnat to know how to use the detector to be as effective as they can at finding goodies. I know that is my major objective but do enjoy a good discussion. One we have kicked all the controls and function around then we start to repeat it again unless someone brings up a new topic. I am guilty of that as it gets boring in the winter just thinking of getting out.
I did get out two days ago and found three nice mini balls. They are drop shot 3 ringers. Man if one of these things hit you it would take your arm off. When I think of these compared to a 9mm, 30-30, and the M16 we used in Vietnam it is amazing. I am still puzzled by the number of mini balls I find that have been chewed on. There was only a minior battle on private property where I hunt so it is not from chewing on the slug as they sawed a leg off. There are so many it makes one think they just chewed them to have someting to chew on.
Have a good one,
HH, Cody
 
Thanks Cody,
I'm relatively new to this forum and getting back into the hobby after a ten year absence. As I gain more experience with the ExpII, I'll be able to relate my engineering background better to my hobby and hope to be more of a contributor to this formum.
Until then, I look forward to reading your interesting postings.
Respectfully,
Kalvin
 
Cody,
Maybe they thought chewing on bullets would put a little lead in their pencil. <img src="/metal/html/lol.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":lol">
One of my farmer friends with some decent sites in the area started raising Elk for the meat and also to sell the horns to companies that market them as an aphrodisiac. That was shortly before Viagara came out and killed the market. <img src="/metal/html/lol.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":lol">
HH, from Tom in the snow belt
 
You know Jack I don't think you are that far off. I have said that many times to my son and the friend we hunt with. I can only guess it was that or the lead may have acted in some way to relieve pain from dental problems. You see the teeth prints in the lead with some being chewed almost flat. Others will be a pretty good looking shot but have teeth prints on them. There were about 2000 soldier camped there for a couple years during the CW. Nothing much happened at the location so it was mostly just waiting or what ever they did as no serious battles are recoded for this area.
HH, Cody
 
Channel program a few weeks back that mentioned bullet chewing. In this case the weather was phenominally hot, and the men would chew the bullets to evoke the salivary response to quench their parched throats.
Seemed odd to me (lead being a poison), but then again, that something we know NOW, not neccessarily back THEN!
I'm sure a large number where chewed to mask dental issues, but the History Channel program added another explanation to go with the rest.
Have a great day, and HH when you get the opportunity!
DAS
 
That makes a lot of sense as it would have been really hot during July and August. When you see an explanation like this it makes you wonder why you did not think of it. I believe this is the key to the chewed shots. I don't know about dental problems at all as this was just a wild guess on my part.
HH, Cody
 
Hi Cody...I read all your post. This post was very informative to me. I have been detecting for over 35 years and love reading the technical info you write. Don't quit!
 
Two other reasons for chewing bullets that would explain the abundance of them.
First, that soldiers would chew them, and then roll them in sand, or excrement, which would then cause infection when fired into a soldier.
Second, it was known that chewed bullets caused more damage than smooth ones.
Dennis
 
That explains the ones that can still be used with a few teeth marks from the ones that are almost chewed flat.
Thanks for the input.
HH, Cody
 
Top