BarnacleBill
New member
I've read many times about how fast the processor in the F70/75/T2 are in ID'ing closely spaced targets. That is that they can un-mask targets that are missed with slower "processed" detectors. Several users report that they can lay out three closely spaced targets and no matter how fast you swing the coil it will report each individual target with a correct ID.
Taking a break from my heavily scheduled Honey Do List I pulled down the F70 to do some testing to satisfy my curiosity.
Equipment:
F70 w/ stock concentric coil.
Settings:
DE mode.
Threshhold Zero
No Notches
GB low 80's.
Sensitivity varied 60 to 70.
Dirt read Zero(0) to One(1) bar.
No EMI noticed.
Battery Meter Full
Location:
Tried several after checking with All Metal to make sure each spot was clean.
Methodology:
Three coins were lined up in a row; Quarter, Nickel, Quarter.
Expected result:
Based on reports from numerous F machine users being able to bring the coins to the point of almost touching and still ID each individual target regardless of coil sweep speed.
Results:
Beginning with the coins closely spaced I found that I received a composite ID with each pass of the coil, this was not the result I expected. So I laid down a ruler and began increasing the spacing incrementally with ever wider gaps. I finally got out to the spacing you see in the photo below which is three inches on center for each coin.
[attachment 139828 ruler.gif]
And this is where the story gets interesting. At first I thought I had been careless in choice of my testing location and moved the targets to check the ground in All Metal again. Ground was clean so I put the targets back. Same result, so I moved to another spot checked in All Metal and re-GB'd and noted Dirt reading. All looked about the same as the previous spot. I varied sweep speeds & height and got the same results. I again moved and repeated the same routine.
Below in the photo is the ID with the Quarter-Nickel-Quarter at three(3) inch on center spacing. Notice the confidence reading is pegged full on.
[attachment 139829 read4.jpg]
Occasionally the ID would be 12 and rarely it would iron wrap into the 90's.
So there you have it......an interesting exercise that has coins laying in a pattern that would not be unusual for a coin spill that would be found in a park or on a beach. I've documented this so that others can replicate my test and cross check my results if they are so inclined. No... "Bert and I come down to the dock about six o'clock in the early morning. Bert went into the boathouse to fetch the pots and the slickers and I went out to the dock to start up the Bluebird."
HH
BarnacleBill
Taking a break from my heavily scheduled Honey Do List I pulled down the F70 to do some testing to satisfy my curiosity.
Equipment:
F70 w/ stock concentric coil.
Settings:
DE mode.
Threshhold Zero
No Notches
GB low 80's.
Sensitivity varied 60 to 70.
Dirt read Zero(0) to One(1) bar.
No EMI noticed.
Battery Meter Full
Location:
Tried several after checking with All Metal to make sure each spot was clean.
Methodology:
Three coins were lined up in a row; Quarter, Nickel, Quarter.
Expected result:
Based on reports from numerous F machine users being able to bring the coins to the point of almost touching and still ID each individual target regardless of coil sweep speed.
Results:
Beginning with the coins closely spaced I found that I received a composite ID with each pass of the coil, this was not the result I expected. So I laid down a ruler and began increasing the spacing incrementally with ever wider gaps. I finally got out to the spacing you see in the photo below which is three inches on center for each coin.
[attachment 139828 ruler.gif]
And this is where the story gets interesting. At first I thought I had been careless in choice of my testing location and moved the targets to check the ground in All Metal again. Ground was clean so I put the targets back. Same result, so I moved to another spot checked in All Metal and re-GB'd and noted Dirt reading. All looked about the same as the previous spot. I varied sweep speeds & height and got the same results. I again moved and repeated the same routine.
Below in the photo is the ID with the Quarter-Nickel-Quarter at three(3) inch on center spacing. Notice the confidence reading is pegged full on.
[attachment 139829 read4.jpg]
Occasionally the ID would be 12 and rarely it would iron wrap into the 90's.
So there you have it......an interesting exercise that has coins laying in a pattern that would not be unusual for a coin spill that would be found in a park or on a beach. I've documented this so that others can replicate my test and cross check my results if they are so inclined. No... "Bert and I come down to the dock about six o'clock in the early morning. Bert went into the boathouse to fetch the pots and the slickers and I went out to the dock to start up the Bluebird."
HH
BarnacleBill