C
calabash digger
Guest
Testing the 2 machines ….[video]https://youtu.be/wgVAUh68zMw[/video]
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
calabash digger said:Testing the 2 machines ….[video]https://youtu.be/wgVAUh68zMw[/video]
calabash digger said:I am in brackish water ...the creeks are tidal here and that is why I ran beach 1... I can run 19 to 20 sens in it and it is quiet as a church mouse. I took my Nox to Holden's beach and tried it in the water quite as a church mouse. I am by no mean's a beach hunter and I am not debating your findings about salt .....You might have a defective unit ???...
Tom Dankowski watched my video and found my findings to be accurate on the Excal being lacking on low to mid conducters. I would say he qualifies as a expert on both units....
My question is this why in the world would a dedicated beach hunter ( GOLD jewelry hunter) want to use a machine that is lacking on gold?? I hear all the crying about bottle caps and such but the Excalibur is missing gold target's that the Nox will scream on. Yes ,I would rather run a sparky machine that will actually hit the targets that I seek.
The Excal will be my backup machine as it is lacking on mid to low conducters and some of the targets I desire fall into that range.
One thing to note in the brackish water I hunt here I get about the same performance as I do in my garden...dug a Rev War plate at 12 inches last hunt. You can see the live dig in the post ...