diggervance
New member
any ideas guys
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
ever seen this coin or token
- Thread starter diggervance
- Start date
JamesBondaka
Active member
I am no expert but I have a fair amount of experience with coins etc. If you want my opinion....I would say....One looks a bit too good and cast and the other looks cast....not struck. If you want to take more pics or send them to me to check out further...that would be great.
Nice finds in any case!
Nice finds in any case!
What photos are you referring too ? Diggervance's or Ant's ? They both posted two ... and Ant's is definitely just a replica example just for comparison purposes . That being said I also have a fair amount of coin knowledge under my belt and Diggervance's looks like a modern replica that was cast and not struck due to straightness of the strike and the overall evenness of the strike . The same goes for the even thickness of the coin or token itself . In short it just looks too perfect to have been struck . IMHO, Woodstock
JamesBondaka said:
JamesBondaka
Active member
I am in total agreement with you! I thought I said the same as you did.
[quote=Woodstock]
What photos are you referring too ? Diggervance's or Ant's ? They both posted two ... and Ant's is definitely just a replica example just for comparison purposes . That being said I also have a fair amount of coin knowledge under my belt and Diggervance's looks like a modern replica that was cast and not struck due to straightness of the strike and the overall evenness of the strike . The same goes for the even thickness of the coin or token itself . In short it just looks too perfect to have been struck . IMHO, Woodstock
[quote=Woodstock]
What photos are you referring too ? Diggervance's or Ant's ? They both posted two ... and Ant's is definitely just a replica example just for comparison purposes . That being said I also have a fair amount of coin knowledge under my belt and Diggervance's looks like a modern replica that was cast and not struck due to straightness of the strike and the overall evenness of the strike . The same goes for the even thickness of the coin or token itself . In short it just looks too perfect to have been struck . IMHO, Woodstock
[/quote]JamesBondaka said: