Been using the Etrack for about 2 weeks; previously used an Explorer XS for 7 years.
Comparisons:
1. Etrack is lighter, mainly due to the lighter coil
2. Etrack seems to be more immune to power line noise. Result is can run higher sens & more depth.
3. Used Explorer mainly in auto and could set to 70 - 100 % (20 to 32)of max sens.
Don't like the Etrack in auto because the machine won't let me set sens to max. The Treshold tone is many times too stable, even with a +3 bump in sens. This means less depth.
I think it was dumb for Minelab to limit auto sens. Also You have no idea what the high frequency sens is in mineralized soils where a lot of small coins are located. You are forced to use manual for depth which is difficult.
Any ideas??
Comparisons:
1. Etrack is lighter, mainly due to the lighter coil
2. Etrack seems to be more immune to power line noise. Result is can run higher sens & more depth.
3. Used Explorer mainly in auto and could set to 70 - 100 % (20 to 32)of max sens.
Don't like the Etrack in auto because the machine won't let me set sens to max. The Treshold tone is many times too stable, even with a +3 bump in sens. This means less depth.
I think it was dumb for Minelab to limit auto sens. Also You have no idea what the high frequency sens is in mineralized soils where a lot of small coins are located. You are forced to use manual for depth which is difficult.
Any ideas??