Hi, I recently purchased a new GT. My thinking was that since I use Excaliburs for water hunting, the GT would be similar at the beach. I like the new GT rod and chest mount configuration and was planning on getting a larger coil such as a WOT for beach use. Despite having lots of success with Excaliburs I now am wondering about the GT, my first Sov. In my yard the GT seems to be real slow and ground noisy. I am use to my MXT which nails targets quickly, even with 12" Hot Shot coil. The MXT meter locks right on. The GT meter seems not able to quite make up its mind? Plus it has to be calibrated and checked with each use! Not so on the MXT. Plus the MXT hits gold nuggets much better than the GT!
Despite this I want to believe that BBS technology will give me the edge on land, like it has in the water. But so far I have not seen any evidence that the GT performs any better than MXT in my yard. So should I work with the GT or stick with what I know for my land hunting. I sort of had mainly beach hunting in mind with the GT, but perhaps a pulse machine is the way to go for that? I also had thought the GT was sort of like my MXT, only better in the salt! But again for prospecting the MXT seems better.
I know this is long but I have one more thought. I like ML technology. However, it does seem slow to use. One must swing the coil slow. At times this makes me feel like a snail! Does all the ML technology really find things other detectors walk right over? If yes, then I'll keep the GT and learn it. If the answer is not really, then perhaps I'll stick with more conventional detector technology for land hunting. Thanks for your thought on this. CC.
I also now wonder if I should replace my GT with a Quattro, which I hear gets unbelievable depth at the beach?
Despite this I want to believe that BBS technology will give me the edge on land, like it has in the water. But so far I have not seen any evidence that the GT performs any better than MXT in my yard. So should I work with the GT or stick with what I know for my land hunting. I sort of had mainly beach hunting in mind with the GT, but perhaps a pulse machine is the way to go for that? I also had thought the GT was sort of like my MXT, only better in the salt! But again for prospecting the MXT seems better.
I know this is long but I have one more thought. I like ML technology. However, it does seem slow to use. One must swing the coil slow. At times this makes me feel like a snail! Does all the ML technology really find things other detectors walk right over? If yes, then I'll keep the GT and learn it. If the answer is not really, then perhaps I'll stick with more conventional detector technology for land hunting. Thanks for your thought on this. CC.
I also now wonder if I should replace my GT with a Quattro, which I hear gets unbelievable depth at the beach?