Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

E-Trac versus the SE Pro with conductive sounds?

christopher-ohio

Active member
I was trying out different settings and airtesting an SE Pro tonight with various targets. I noticed that if I used conductive sounds with a silver dime for example with a bunch of square nails around it that I would hear it clearly(high tone) through the null using Bryce Brown's SE settings(conductive sounds) in Andy's book but if I hunted my "usual way" in ferrous and all metal with the same target, that same dime sounded like a trash real low midtone target at almost all angles which I probably wouldn't dig. I also noticed that the conductive number varied very little and it was the ferrous number that changed like the E-Trac. Considering the E-Trac coin program which uses conductive sounds too, I'm wondering if the reason some targets are being found with the E-Trac after an SE is because of the machine set-up particularly in ferrous all-metal and the tedency not to dig those low midtones and if the Slimline SE coil is being used instead of the Pro coil? Plus, hunting with the E-Trac wide open is almost impossible to do for too long in my experience. So what I'm trying to say is that Andy and many other experienced Explorer/E-trac users of this forum have espoused the use of patterns/iron mask for this very reason I believe. I think the next step is to set-up of both machines in essentially the same way and try it on real world in the ground targets and see what happens. For those who may have done this already, any info would be appreciated and benefit many...thanks in advance...HH
 
I would love to read your results. If you could try that with both detectors in their stock set up settings as one of the base test patterns even if you do it on bench tests in your home I would be interested in what differences you see. Maybe also keeping your coils the same if possible. of course there will be variables but if you compare the two at least I would like to see what you find.
I hunt with my EXplorer with Iron set wide open basicaly AM mode a good part of the time but like you after hours of concentrating like that I need a break. But in the right area I will stick with it if I am finding things. Then I might change things up and start again. I do not have the E trac but am reading posts like yours to see if I will . Best of luck to you.
 
Top