Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

E-Trac Numbers Chart.

J

Jesse W. McComas

New member
Hi everybody. Snow today, no hunting. I have a problem. I have lost my printout of where finds fall on the number scale. If anybody has that chart, would you please post it again so that I can print it out. It will be some time before I will be able to hunt, so I will need that chart to play around the house and learn more about this great machine. Thanks again in advance. HH...Jesse.
 
I was "ON" for a new E-Trac until I looked at that chart again. If you graph those numbers, the E-Trac changed to a linear detector like the single freq units. How can everything be at 12 or 13 ferrous regardless of trash or valuable? Just looking at that chart something seems wrong.

The F75 is already a speed demon with mediocre discrimination. I've been enjoying my Explorer because even though I'm walking like a zombie, I'm digging less.
 
It's not! It's close but according to Andy the CO number is fairly constant no matter the other variables. The FE may range from 12-17. Get a hold of Andy's book and read the section about FE12 and you'll get a good explanation. It's not a problem in the field. If you changed to 'off; for that reason there will just be more for the Explorer series users to find. Regards...Jim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top