I run my machines with the minimal amount of discrimination,if i am on a celtic/roman or saxon site almost all the target come out,cannot have that doubting feeling in the back of my mind was it a decent find or not,this also applies to deep barely audio signal,a decent set of headphones are ultra critical especially after you have spent alot of money on a decent detector only to buy a el-cheapo set of headphones.
Also i rarely use a screen,as these can be un-reliable but tones are pretty accurate most of the time and at greater depth as well,when using my Pulse as this does not have any discrimination as such,you have no option but to dig,but saying that as a general rule its best to use a Pulse on a site that has been cleaned out first by a VLF machine,this then gives you the advantage of a 'higher reward to effort ratio'.
Some sites i agree can be a total nightmare,can only of course speak for our sites in the UK,but some very early sites can have alot of trash,so this is when coil discipline and size of a coil is ultra important,using a small coil on a trashy site gives you a good advantage.
No 2 sites are the same,so each one has to be detected slightly different,i think this is when experience counts and not necessary the detector,after all a detector cannot work out by itself what is a good or a bad target,its the operator that decides not the machine.
A very interesting topic for sure.