What would you guys say to the differences in the Whites V3i vs Whites mxt. One of the guys I go hunting with is always finding twice as much as the guys with the V3i with his mxt. Is it that we are always looking at the different features on the V3i which slows us down.
The extra features on the V3i teases users to over-analyze. You paid top dollar for these options. I am sure that is does slow down most all users. I was guilty during the 6 years I ran my V3i.
It's just speculation...I believe the sluggish finds with the V3i happens due to the three frequencies, a CPU in the V3i crunching the numbers, the TID numbers jumpy at any real depth. I feel that the V3i needs a firmware upgrade. It's been years now. I blame much of the lackluster finds compared to the single frequency MXT, to mismanaged data analysis. Add two this, an owner of a top of the line detector will surely tweak around to hear weak coins down past 7-8 inches.
I own 2 White's M6 units now, and I've always vacuumed up coins much quicker than with the V3i. I never put much time into testing the V3i in single tone much though to backup my idea.
Three frequency V3i not getting the depth with good VDI that the M-series do well, is IMPO, a "processing anchor" when put up against the speed of the MXT and M6.