imp511 said:
I've already asked and will check at station again when I check in!
MP
Ask enough people enough times and you'll no doubt eventually find someone to tell you no...
As Tom said so well, a person who could care less about you detecting may still tell you no when you ask because they're thinking in terms of liabilities and covering their rear end. It's much easier and safer for job security just to tell you no.
We can all make suggestions. But ultimately, MP, it boils down to what you need to do to feel comfortable enough to detect.
If you feel you need to ask permission from multiple people or get written permission to be comfortable detecting, so be it.
Let me tell you a story from back in my youth in the 1980's when I worked as a headhunter for a period of time.
Whenever any of us had a client company looking to fill a position, one question that we always asked was about the hiring/interview process.
The ideal situation for a prospective employee (and for me since I made a commission when a client company hired someone I hooked them up with) was one interview with one person making the decision on hiring.
The more people involved in the hiring decision, the more interviews involved, the less likely any of us would be to work very hard to find a candidate for the position.
Why? Because the more people involved in the decision, the more likely for someone to have a problem with the prospective employee.
Personally, whenever I detect somewhere that needs permission all I need is one OK and I'm detecting.
If I notice someone checking me out I smile and wave. Usually they wave back and go on their way. Sometimes they'll ask if I found anything. "A lot of beer tabs and bottlecaps, but I'm having fun" is always a good answer. If they inquire, I'll drop the name of the person who gave me permission.
Good retrieval techniques are extremely important, too. When someone in authority is checking you out, you don't want them to see any trace of damage or disturbance to the area where you retrieved your targets.