Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Depth comparisons between Cibola, Vaquero, Tejon

sekypaleo

New member
Can anybody give real world information on depth differences between the Cibola, Vaquero and and Tejon? Yes, I know the Cibola lacks the ground balance of the other two, but I am limited on money at the moment and am wanting to get one of the 3 to use with the 10" X 12" DD coil for hunting open fields and pastures for CW relics. Bill
 
The Cibola gets pretty good depth in non mineralized soils, in highly mineralized soils it can be very
disappointing, as it has fixed ground balance.

The V will get better depth (manual GB), especially if your hunting all metal mode.

The Tejon is your best bet, it packs a lot more power to penetrate tuff ground conditions, one
of the best relic detectors made when hunting in all metal mode.

Find a used Tejon, try one of our forum sponsors
Backwoods Classified Posting
 
Never used a V, but the Tejon is significantly hotter than the Cibola and has an excellent reputation in the US and abroad as a relic hunter,
 
Hi,
I used de Leon with fixed GB like Cibola. Now use Vaquero. In highly mineralized ground, the V. seems to have 2 times better depth than the one with fixed GB.
Ground balancing possibility is in my opinion crucial for better effects.
 
Top