To increase the probablitity of hitting deep signals:
Slow you sweep speed.....really slow down.
Increase you gain setting (more important than you think!)
OK. You guys can yell at me if you like. I think I can actually hit deeper with the machine set at (A) sensitivity, compared to the +1 to +3. The etrac is so sensitive that in a trashy park or highly mineralized ground I think that overpowering the machine is counterproductive. Obviously at a clean site there would be advantages of running at +3, I actually did hunt with it on a beach in Flordia +3 and hit targets close to a 12 inches I would estimate. But beach and ground are quite different. I will have to put more time on the machine, but with the (A) sensitivity setting the machine runs smooth as silk, with little or no falsing. In that mode here in Wisconsin it hovers around 22 sensitivity at most sites.
Also...some non-machine thougths. Some locations don't contain targets that are deep, and other locations all there is is deep targets. So unless you have evidence that there is a layer a targets at the edge of detection depth, don't try to "fool yourself into thinking there is something wrong with the machine." I hunted at a park in upstate NY last year that was ridicously underhunted. There were deep wheat pennies all over, along with some silver, etc. The machine worked flawlessly, actually unbeliveable. I took it then home to one of my haunts that has given up the goods in the past, but where I throughly "Explored" in the past, and I struggled to find squat.......second guessed everything, every setting, read all the nay-sayers on the forum, slept on that all winter, etc. I took it to a new site a couple of weeks ago.......the machine worked like dynamite.
So....if you can hit coin sized targets at 6 inches with good TID and solid audio........you probably would hit them a couple inches deeper. The audio will not be as crisp on target at the edge of detection, but the key will be how they repeat. With the etrac it is easier to determine obvious falsing vs potential iffy with the audio first, then now with the added TID # to give even more info. Falses are more likely to vary in audio, sound scratchy, like to null, and don't pinpoint on the spot of the sound......good targets will sound "clearer" even if they are breaking up, not null the machine out, and pinpoint right on, and TID will not bounce all over the place.
Brad