that it's such a departure from anything else out there because it apparently was designed at least in part, (when in the enhanced mode) to do things "differently" from other detectors. We all like to do tests a lot in the hopes of defining the capability of a detector and develop confidence in it prior to, or in between, actual field usage. I believe, for whatever it's worth, that the 3-D, when in enhanced mode, more than any other detector out there, will just mess with your mind when we do our tests, whether they be air, or in our test gardens. Most test gardens don't date back 50 years so can and should we really put much if any faith in what we see from them when using the 3-D? I'm not saying anyone here doesn't know what they're doing or that so and so's detector must be messed up and another is probably just fine. I am saying I think the 3-D in enhanced mode should not be evaluated by "testing". I fully realize that it's very difficult to find a site that is by definition THE place to capitalize on the supposed unique strengths of the 3-D, but I do know the several times I did use it at such a site, it worked VERY well, and found a shocking amount of old targets behind years of hunting with Explorers and everything before that, etc. The old coins consistantly did in fact register in the high tone and based on my experience, wouldn't have with any other detector that I'd used up to that point. Once again, I get the same sort of results everyone is talking about WITH MY "TESTS" on my 3-D, but in the true older intact fields, mine works as billed.