Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

CW Relic Hunting in Alabama

Canewrap

New member
I'm not asking for help in finding sites, just some insight from those members that have been relic hunting in Alabama for quite a while. One of the problems I seem to keep running up against is that many of the sites I've located through research have been destroyed through land modification or development. Its where I'm convinced that if I cannot locate a set of woods reasonably close to where the site should be, its probably not worth bothering. Is anyone else running up against this?
 
I'm not from Alabama, but we have the same problem here in Virginia, as well as most other states. Just keep researching and trying out spots that "seem like a good place"; you'll eventually find relics. I've actually had pretty good success with those sites I decided to just try my luck without any research, woods or open areas. Your state is rich in history and continuing your efforts should pay off.

A good rule of thumb passed on to me by long-time relic hunters is to always try high ground near water located close to a transportation route that was in use during the CW (or before). Many modern roadways follow the same original paths used back in the day, but are usually re-directed to a certain degree to allow for better traffic flow, such as avoiding numerous turns around natural geological features like rock outcroppings, waterways, hillsides and such. I've found many abandoned old roadbeds next to major highways this way and located relics. Be prepared to dig trash, but dig enough and you'll have some success.

One of the best places I've detected was an old creek crossing about a hundred yards upstream from a 4 lane highway. This crossing was in use during the CW. A few battles and skirmishes occured near this spot, and from the items I found, it appears soldiers discarded items either before or after crossing over. A lot of trash was dug near the creek from post-war flooding, but methodically moving my search away from the water yielded more relics and less trash. Also, field hospitals were frequently located near waterways adjacent to then-used transportation routes for obvious reasons.

Continue your research, but also trust your luck and instinct of what looks like a good spot. A day out digging is always better than a good day at work or home watching TV.

Best of luck, and HH.
 
The key is most instances is water. The only source you had was on your side making for a limited distance from a resupply. As a commander, you didn't want to bunk down for the night in the Sahara, for example. You wanted your troops to have plenty of water.

This didn't limit their marching orders to mean "river to river and then stop." If a family had a well along the way, they may stop there. (A full-strength regiment could actually run a family's well dry overnight.)

But like ConfedCav said, keep in mind the three criteria: old road, water, high ground. When you positively have these three present -- something's there.

Good Hunting

Richard
 
Top