Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Coinstrike Questions

okie-colin

New member
A few questions. In the specs for the Coinstrike they don't list frequencies. Is the Coinstrike a multi frequency detector? I use my CZ3D often with a friend who has a Minelab Explorer II. I find as many good target as he does, but I dig alot more holes and trash. I kind of wish I had an ID/digital machine. I also like the idea of a programable machine like the White's DFX and the Explorer II. Would like to stick with Fisher, but I want multi-frequency and the versatility of programming. I probably would go with a Coinstrike in spite of the lack of programming if I knew it was multi-frequency. In general what do you that own one think of this digital machine?
 
It's frequency listings were "properiatary" (sp?). Basically, FRL ain't sayin'.

HH from Allen in MI
 
I did a lot of research on the Coin-Strike and most of it was positive,so I bought one Saturday. I am glad I did because, with only about 2 hours experience I tried it out in my test garden.
The Coin-Strike out preformed my other 2 detectors which are top of the line of other brands.
The Coin-Strike can be programed. You can enter 3 of your own programs. As far as multi-frequency I don't know. Only Fisher could tell you. mtdoramike who is on this form is who I got a lot of good information from regarding settings. He uses one quite a bit and approves of it performance. Good luck Bernie
 
but I didn't care for the CZ3d. Your right, you will dig a lot of junk with it. I can find as many targets with my CZ70 or C$ and dig a whole lot less trash then I did with the CZ3d. I think the CZ3d is a great unit for pre-1950's sites, but for modern sites, it leaves a bit to be desired.

I also just got a GTi1500 and out of 25 digs, I might average 2-3 junk targets. That imaging features is great. The depth is close to the depth of the CZ5, which I also have.
 
The only multi-freq. detector that Fisher is still producing is the CZ-3d, and to top it all off it's been designed for pre-60's sites. So using it for hunting in modern areas or areas with a lot of modern trash is going to give you fits.

Fisher no longer manufactures mult-freq. units for "conventional", (if I can use this word), metal detecting.

The Coinstrike is a single frequency detector. Don't worry the world hasn't come to an end, it can hunt with the best of them no matter if there single or multi- freq..

Mr. Bill
 
If your your looking for depth and less trash, and if your a capable detectorist, the C$ is for you. The C$ operates on one frequency, but it does better than any multi frequency I have ever used. Its not without its problems. For me its hot rocks. It loves hot rocks. But even with that, its the best machine I have ever used. Multi frequency seems to be falling out of favor. You now see allot of new generation detectors coming out with one frequency. Don't get me wrong, multi-freq detectors work fine. My cz-5 is the machine that will work if my C$ is having problems. But my C$ goes just a bit deeper, and I dig alot less trash, especially iron.
HH Gerry (Kidd)
 
Proprietary huh? I don't need to know the exact frequencies, only that it is multi - frequency or not. Anyone considering the purchase of a new detector would need that information. Seems like a mistake on Fisher's part not to include this information.
 
Top