Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Coinmaster GT vs M6

Hey all, I'm curious how the two compare to each other. It appears the Gt is basically a Prizm 6t which use to be priced the same as an M6. If the GT gets performance as well as the M6 that I would consider that a great buy. I love the features on the Gt at it's price point I just worry that it won't get good depth on coins. Deep coins in my area are typically 7-8 inches. Any opinions folks? Thanks.
 
Actually I just watched an airtest of the GT and wasn't impressed at all. I know airtests don't mean everything but the GT's was one of the worst I have ever seen.
 
Jason, You can,t believe all air test. Some are in bad place to do any test. I have been hearing that the GT will get coins at 7" or 8" i don,t know i don,t have one, but i will keep reading till it has been used for awhile then i will think about buying one. I know Whites always makes top detectors. The 6T did very well and the GT is just about like it. Keep reading and then step back and take a look and if it is something you like get it. Good Luck Flintstone
 
I read about a guy out in oregon on another forum, who claims his soil is very mineralized and that it got depth equal to his xtera 305
and that the GT was a lot faster. Ground conditions have an affect on what depth you will get.
 
I understand that airtests don't exactly equal targets in ground but they are pretty close usually. This is one of the worst air tests I have ever seen to be honest.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0al7rcK8_os
 
It may not have great depth in the air test, but, did you notice how rock steady the VDI numbers were?
 
I have a m6 my son n law has a coin gt..air tests are equal
his will identify a penny at 10 " in an air test..he is loving it...been finding a ton of coins with it at depths to 7" with gokd signals
 
Curious, you say you use the coinmaster and that you love it, so what are you getting out in the field. My eyes
might be playing tricks on me, but it looked like it was hitting and 8 to 9 inches on some.
 
Air tests for the most part are worthless, especially when done indoors surrounded by EMI. Seasoned in ground targets are the only way to compare the depth on different detectors in YOUR ground. This is why everyone should have a test garden. I have seen in ground test results vary from 5 inches to 12+ with the same machine.......... different ground. Where you hunt makes a BIG difference on depth.
 
Both can provide features and performance to satisfy a lot of avid hobbyists. Not just beginners but serious, avid hunters. However .....

MichiganJason said:
Hey all, I'm curious how the two compare to each other.
You can easily compare the Coin GT with the lower-priced Coinmaster models or the Prizm series, and you can easily compare the features and field performance of the M6 with its big-brother MXT and MXT Pro.

But since they are different in their design function and Discrimination and Sensitivity settings, etc., they can't be fairly compared against each other. You can compare some generalities, such as does model 'A' respond to a located target similar to, not as good as, or better than model 'B.' Or you can compare how model 'A' identifies a located target compared with model 'B' with regard to a TID or VDI response.

Doing this will let a hobbyist learn how one detector type works to better understand how it compares with another model and, in the end, they can draw some conclusion that might aide them is selecting one model over the other. But a direct comparison between the M6 and Coin GT is a bit different. It will also depend upon how much experience you have had with other detectors in the past and what you might be familiar with.

MichiganJason said:
It appears the Gt is basically a Prizm 6t which use to be priced the same as an M6.
That's correct. The Coin GT IS the Prizm 6T so far as adjustment features and performance and, as I have mentioned elsewhere, the only difference is that the Coin GT is burgundy in color and uses the more simple Coinmaster rod system. Yes, the Prizm 6T did list for the same ($699.95) as the M6 and I always felt that was well above what it would better sell for. Why? Because, as I stated, they work differently, and the M6 also has a larger selection of search coils.

I liked the 6T but preferred my M6 at the time to compliment my MXT. Once I moved to the MXT Pro I parted with my MXT as well as my M6, but that did leave a void for a simile detector that would still be functional for me to use and have fun (and success), as well as use as a loaner unit. With the new Coin GT ... at a very affordable $399.95 suggested retail ... that filled the void for me.

MichiganJason said:
If the GT gets performance as well as the M6 that I would consider that a great buy. I love the features on the Gt at it's price point I just worry that it won't get good depth on coins. Deep coins in my area are typically 7-8 inches. Any opinions folks? Thanks.
The Coin GT is a more digital functioning detector. The M6 has a more analog/digital blend, as I describe it, and I prefer that performance overall.

The Coin GT relies on a 9-segment Discrimination design to accept or reject the 'segments' you want. The circuitry design determines the acceptance points of each segment. The M6 features a variable knob to adjust the Discrimination setting. While it doesn't reject above the typical zinc cent and screw cap range, it does allow the detectorist the ability to "fine tune" a Disc. setting that is just at a point of rejection, not the "all-or-none" design of a segmented Discrimination.

Both the Coin GT and M6 have a very quick automated Ground Balance and Auto-Trac, and both let you lock the GB setting if desired. Both provide TID info and very readable VDI numbers for improved target identification. I have found individual coins with my M6's and Prizm 6T's and now the Coin GT that sounded good, produced reasonably decent VDI read-outs, and were in both typical coin-depth ranges to about 4", and then those that were deeper, from 6" to 8+".

The Prizm 6T and Coinmaster GT should not be considered as very simple and maybe inferior performing detectors like some competitor's models. Instead, they can work well and, with the best coil for the task, they will more than satisfy a lot of hobbyists or even savvy detecorists. The M6 can also surprise many avid searchers, but quite honestly, there are many people who just fit into a rut where they think a detector has to have a lot of adjustment functions to work a lot better than the next detector, but that's not always true.

I have friends who have bought a Prizm 6T or new Coin GT because they like it better than their other models, to include White's DFX, XLT, and Classic ID and IDX Pro models. Why? Because they like the feel and balance, but mainly because of the easy-to-adjust controls, back-light, quick GB with ability to lock and hold a setting, and they also prefer the notch segment type Discrimination over a variable design.

Now, after all that babbling let me try to answer the Coin GT Vs M6 selection questions.

If you have used models such as the Garrett Ace 250 or an Ace 350, or the Teknetics Delta or Gamma, I think the Coin GT might satisfy you quite well. I know it did me and fit in my personal detector arsenal. I like it better than any of those models, and even more than some that cost a few hundred dollars more. If, however, you have used models like the XLT or MXT, or Minelab X-Terra 50/505 or 70/705 units or some Garrett models closer to that $700 retail price, I think you would like the M6. I know I do, and if I didn't have an MXT Pro in my arsenal, the M6 would be there to handle the bulk of my hunting needs.

My opinions and those of other posters can only hint to some of the things we like about these models. Only you, the end consumer, can make a final decision because they are not the same and every individual needs to check out both model, then form their own conclusion.

Monte
 
Thank you for the very articulate response Monte. Having detected for years and currently using an At Pro I think I would probably be happier with the M6. While the At Pro is a good machine, I like the build quality of Whites detectors much better and the variety of coils is vast. Not to mention I think Whites TID at depth is superior to the AT pro.
 
Well i use the coinmaster pro and il have too say if the coinmaster GT is half as better as the pro it will not have any problems at 8-9 inches mine hits very well on relics at 10-13 inches ...just my two cents
 
I have read your post over the years and stil i wonder what is it you look for when yo try a detector out?I think last count if iam right you have had 20 or 21 xlt and i think m6 owned 5 What makes you give up the machine and then get the same model again?What are some of the factor you look at for the machine to be correct is depth or blance meaning not the weight but is it running correctly like the ground blance .What do they use at factory to ground blance a machine and how do you know when it is out of wack? There is a stone than can be use for ground blance i think but dont remeber what it is called.Thanks
 
ohio fred said:
I have read your post over the years and stil i wonder what is it you look for when yo try a detector out?
Aways, I consider a detector/coil combination's weight and balance to provide me with a good 'fit and feel' for comfort and performance.

I also check a detector against my 4 Performance Test conditions. To make it to my #1- use detector classification, a model must pass all four of them. I developed these four different 'tests' based upon actual in-the-field experiences I have encountered in the various types of detecting I prefer to engage in. Now, I m sure you wonder what the 4 Performance Test challenges are? Well, they are simple things found in challenging conditions. They include:

1.. My 'Nial Board Performance Test'. This is an in-the-field encounter I had in the ghost town of Frisco, Utah on Memorial Day Weekend, 1994. One of the biggest challenges we can encounter in both tough urban conditions as well as those out-of-town sites we hunt, are those dealing with masking conditions from the very common iron nails. The story that led to this encounter, and what I then duplicated to make a universal 'Nail Board' so anyone can experience the exact duplication of the Indian Head 1
 
Thanks for all the imformation was really help full.Just joking but my next question is what do look for when you buy a car and what do the car salesman say when they see you coming.
 
I talked to the sales rep in the Ohio distrubution center who said it's weak on nickels but
otherwise it's not a bad little machine for general hunting. I think the only reason for
getting a higher end machine like the MXT or the M6 is for more serious hunting and
wheree you have meneralized ground conditions.
Robert
 
Top