Critterhunter
New member
I've recently read a few posts (no names, let alone model names!) of people comparing certain machines they own to each other. Often I see these comparisons are invalid, because they are using say an 8" coil or even a 10" coil on say a Xcal or GT for instance, while the other machine is using a coil that is a bit or even a good bit larger in size.
So keep that in mind when you are *privately* (to satisfy your own curiosity) comparing your machines to each other in terms of depth or even separation. In terms of depth, with two somewhat similarly capable machines, the one with the larger coil generaly wins. And of course in terms of separation a sharper detection field, or of course a smaller coil, will often do better...Even if the machine you are testing it against has a much faster recovery speed.
Just some thoughts to keep in mind as you see what your machines can and can't do for simple curiousity sake *privately*. Largely, in a good capable detector, such as Minelabs, the real edge on depth or separation goes to the machine using a bigger or sharper (or smaller) coil. You've got to try to at least compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges *for yourself privately* in terms of similar sized coils to each other. I know the 12x10, with only a 2" length difference between it and my 10" Tornado, is showing much better depths in my soil...even though both coils are exactly the same size in width.
Before considering upgrading one of your detectors, and that includes any detector from any company, find out from others what a good aftermarket coil might do for it in terms of depth and separation...To the point where you don't really see a difference between it and the machine you were comparing it to. A good aftermarket coil can make all the difference, and is a much cheaper alternative in some situations than upgrading your detector.
So keep that in mind when you are *privately* (to satisfy your own curiosity) comparing your machines to each other in terms of depth or even separation. In terms of depth, with two somewhat similarly capable machines, the one with the larger coil generaly wins. And of course in terms of separation a sharper detection field, or of course a smaller coil, will often do better...Even if the machine you are testing it against has a much faster recovery speed.
Just some thoughts to keep in mind as you see what your machines can and can't do for simple curiousity sake *privately*. Largely, in a good capable detector, such as Minelabs, the real edge on depth or separation goes to the machine using a bigger or sharper (or smaller) coil. You've got to try to at least compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges *for yourself privately* in terms of similar sized coils to each other. I know the 12x10, with only a 2" length difference between it and my 10" Tornado, is showing much better depths in my soil...even though both coils are exactly the same size in width.
Before considering upgrading one of your detectors, and that includes any detector from any company, find out from others what a good aftermarket coil might do for it in terms of depth and separation...To the point where you don't really see a difference between it and the machine you were comparing it to. A good aftermarket coil can make all the difference, and is a much cheaper alternative in some situations than upgrading your detector.