Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Cibola field test #2 Notes

A

Anonymous

Guest
Earlier this week someone asked about the <STRONG><STRONG>Cibola</STRONG></STRONG> and I made some comments to him concerning how it operated in iron etc. Yesterday, I was fortunate enough to get with the machine for a few more hours in a second camp with much iron. I also brought a top of the line machine that has multifrequencies as well as both a smaller coil for working around iron as well as a 15" coil for digging deep targets. This camp is nestled on the side of a hill with about 40 to 50 hut sites both seen and unseen. It has been pounded recently due to construction in and around the camp. Do to the amount of iron both shallow and deep, the <STRONG><STRONG>Cibola</STRONG></STRONG> was a bit of a bear to operate as the there is much iron everywhere. If you turn your disc up to above iron you will lose most buttons so you have to keep the disc down as well as the sensitivity down. What is down? The disc set to minimum and the sensitivity set to 8-10. Even with those settings the machine would pop on square nails every few feet making target determination difficult. Even by turning the disc up-there were mutiple target responses that when dug would turn out to be bent square nails. Again using this machine I was able to pull a few buck balls out of the ground. These buck balls have the same sound as a cuff button so the more you dig, the better chances you have of finding a cuff button.
I detected for a period of about 7 hours (1 hr using the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG>) and located a few buck balls and one small cartridge box rivet. I finally gave up using the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG> as it was <span style="background-color:#ffff00;">too difficult to operate in this area </span>and switched over to the multifreqency machine.
With the multi-frequency machine and the small coil, I was able to pull a handful of buck balls out of the ground, a precussion cap in a hut that I dug out. An odd wire thin buckle (suspender buckle).
Summary, using the standard coil in an iron infested area with both shallow and deep signals, it is very difficult to use the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG> without getting multiple hits in an area or constantly digging iron nails (square).
<span style="background-color:#ffff00;">*Problems- (1) If the area has too much iron you will get to many good hits that will make digging impossible. </span>Solution- turn the disc up and the sensivity down- but by doing this you will lose out on many fines.
Solution- dig anything repeatable even at the disc setting of minimum. By doing this you will work the law of averages and end up finding something someone left behind because they didn't dig, and you did.
<span style="background-color:#ffff00;">*Problem- (2) Even with the disc setting higher just below tab- Mutiple "good" sounding targets sounded off by the machine, and when dug the signals ended up being square nails. </span>Solution- turn disc down to min below iron and again dig the nails, and use them later for a test garden. Using the law of averages you will find something valuable that others left behind.
Solution- purchase a smaller coil and slowly re-work any area like this, being methodical in your search and grid out small areas. You should find something someone left behind because they didn't make the effort to locate the deeper targets and you did!
Although the air test between a button and large square nail at minimum discrimination will notch out the nail, in the field this does not prove to be true especially when nails are everywhere making digging rather difficult. For those individuals who dig cellar holes, it might be a bit of a problem to make the determination to dig or not to dig. From my research apparently the circuitry of the T,V, and C are the same in lines of discrimination and the only difference is the "C" is turn on and go and the "T,V" you can ground balance. In an area which doesn't have too much iron, say iron pieces every 1 to 2 feet, this machine would do well. However if the iron is littered on the ground as in this camp every 2 to 4"-digging is impossible- or tackle the ground by getting a smaller coil apparently the 5.75 coil.
Out of a seven hour period of detecting, I used the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG> about 45 minutes to 1 hour as compared with the multifrequency machine that was used for up to 6 hours. Whenever you are in this type of hunting condition, the best area to detect in is the iron. Some of you may ask, "why"? In those areas you will find the best of the relics or coins. Other machines will behave similarly in these conditions. No machine is 100% detectable in iron. Tales of the Nautalus being able to dig through iron are noted, however it would be easy to guess that only some of the relics or coins have been dug do to the incredible amount of iron at any given site. Next strategy is to turn the clock back by turning the disc to minimum using the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG> and dig every signal as if it were an all metal machine as that is how it reacts in this particular area and dig some good targets that others were to impatient to check out.
<span style="background-color:#ffff00;">Overall impression of the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG> with the standard coil in this particular camp was fair to poor</span>. I have been detecting for 30 years with most top of the line machines. Primary machine is the Minelab Explorer XS, and back up is the <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG>.
<span style="background-color:#ffff00;">Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated, especially if there are some seasoned, experienced users using either the "T, V, or <STRONG>Cibola</STRONG>", in similar conditions.
<STRONG></STRONG></span>
 
Have a look at Gary's field test at http://mysite.freeserve.com/garysukdetecting/
Under field tests.
Brian
 
Appreciate the info! Contradicts what some dealers are saying about the iron performance. Gotta wonder???...Oh well <img src="/metal/html/shrug.gif" border=0 width=37 height=15 alt=":shrug">
Tom
 
Hey Christian,
I use the tejon and I have to recommend when you get in real thick iron you have to slow down. The tejon is pretty noisy in a lot of iron but I can pull out buttons and brass really well and unlike you just did I don't dig nails, ever! So don't know about the cibola but me and my buddies dont have the problem you just had. We hardly ever dig nails just plenty of brass and lead ! <img src="/metal/html/biggrin.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":D">
Peter
 
you made the comment the 3 machines had similar circuitry.Maybe they do not sure, but me and my buddies hardly ever dig nails with our tejons.
Pete
 
Posted By: Peter Eles <Send E-Mail> (cache-mtc-ak06.proxy.aol.com)
Date: Sunday, 12 October 2003, at 6:10 p.m.
In Response To: After Your 36+ Years... (Mike(NC))
My opinion is that its (the Tejon) a good detector for hunting relics but I can think of a few others that are just as good or even better.Anytime you get guys saying its hands down better than anything out there and then seasoned relic hunters try it and go eeeeeehhhh not bad but not mind boggling as it's been stated. Of course you'll get commotion and uproar and all that. Calling it the baddest thing on the block is what did it. Its good no doubt but the best out there? Thats very much a matter of opinion.
Peter
 
I don't have Cibola , but I do have a Vaquero which should be pretty close to it . I hit old cellar holes and farm fields here in MA. I have to say that I haven't dug a nail yet . I had a Fisher and I dug plenty of nails ...it just loved nails .
I set the Vaquero at Pull Tab , I pick up buttons , brass , Large Cents , Indian Head pennies (1866 and up), and everything above . At that setting it nocks out most for the large Iron . Also a Nickel will crackle and brake-up at that setting . So I just turn it down to Nickel and whip it fast over the Target .If it doesn't brake-up it will be a good target . The soil around here is Tuff and there is lots of junk . By setting it at pull tap I don't have to listen to all the crackling of Iron . I guess there are better detectors out there, but for the money and the ease of swinging it . It's not a bad deal . My hearing isn't as go as it use to be , so if I get a good signal in both directions I dig it . If it brakes up with a fast sweep I don't .
Hunt Well
Dennis
 
if you use the standard coil. And that is true even for those with the best iron discrimination. Its not the Cibola but the coil size that did poorly -a coil size mismatch with the site.
In my trashy sites, my Bandido 2 uMax with the 4" coil has found more coins & relics than my standard coil. Tesoros are known to have great discrimination and if you use a small coil on it - it will be deadly in trashy sites.
HH,
Doug
 
Just got a Vaquero - I'd like to know how to stop digging nails especially if its a real sensitive unit.
Where is your disc & sens setting on the Tejon at these high iron sites? thanks.
 
I was going on another diggers personal opinion before I had a chance to try one for myself. Moral to this story is don't listen to what others tell you no matter how good a hunter you think they are. You must try one for yourself and you be the judge. I had an X5 liked it a lot.Then I tried a tejon and quickly realized the tejon was a better detector for what I liked to do, end of story. Not only that I wasnt the only person out there that figured out the same thing! Tejons are still selling really well but what about the X5 <img src="/metal/html/grin.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":grin"> ?? Only some die hards like you still use one and I see you have a problem with me being successful with the tesoro, especially if you have to go back almost 3 yrs to find an old post like that <img src="/metal/html/cry.gif" border=0 width=40 height=15 alt=":cry"> <img src="/metal/html/cry.gif" border=0 width=40 height=15 alt=":cry"> Poor little X5 using cry baby <img src="/metal/html/cry.gif" border=0 width=40 height=15 alt=":cry"> <img src="/metal/html/cry.gif" border=0 width=40 height=15 alt=":cry"> Your pathetic whoever you are
Peter
 
Forgot to mention I listened to the other diggers opinion as I always thought him to be a real good relic hunter as evidenced by his finds. He said the Tejon wasnt as good as the X5 and I went with what he told me according to his testing between the two but I didn't know one real important detail at the time. His comments about the X5 vs tejon were pro X5 because he was being given new detectors(X5's) and Troy headphones for nice finds and comments he was making about it at the time ! No damn wonder he thought the X5 was better <img src="/metal/html/shocked.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":shock"> his love was being bought and paid for back then and I had no idea but he later did fess up and told me this was absolutely true!So to the guy who called me a flip flopper its partly true. I wish you could see what I'm flipping you right now <img src="/metal/html/lol.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":lol"> <img src="/metal/html/lol.gif" border=0 width=15 height=15 alt=":lol">
Peter
 
Top