Bounty Hunter 2200 Vs the F2

[robert roy]

I've noticed the two machines: BH 2200 and the F2 look very much alike.
Has anyone used the BH 2200. Just wonder how it stands up against the F2.
RR

 

[dougmoore34]

I can not make any wild claims about the little 2200 but...
Mine was easy to use, cheap enough to leave in my jeep and paid for itself fast. I have flat out hunted some pretty high end detectors with my 2200. I loved that little machine and miss it on some days. She was a good detector.

 

[Wishful-thinker]

This may answer your question. 3300 v/s F4

 

[digging nm]

i have one, it pinpoints well the id is accurate but there are days i have doubts about its depth capabilities. a friend and i put the 2200 and a garrett 250 to the same tests and they did about the same. i think the end results probably come more from practice and experience.

 

[robert roy]

The BH2200 is a scaled down version of the BH3300 like the F2 is a scaled down version of the F4?
There is no ground balancing on the BH2200 and no pinpointing. Someone told me you have to do
some fancy Xing to find your target. Now I have never used a machine that you had to X inorder to pinpoint so
I don't quite picture it in my mind.

From your excellent comparison of the BH3300 and the F4 it does sound like the F4 out classes the BH3300 however.

As much as I distrust Fisher products, I may well try the F4 somewhere down the like.

Has anyone done any air testing of the BH2200?

RR

 

[robert roy]

So what happened to HER?
She run of with someone else?
Seriously, though, what happened? You end up upgrading?
RR