88junior said:
What the heck they would rather for the relics to lay under ground and deteriorate than have them dug up and put out for view in a museum that's what drives me crazy!! I don't know about you guys but I'd go and dig those relics up at no charge and give them to the right authorities just to know I saved a part of history and be able to share it with future generations.
EXACTLY what I was going to say!
If the "archies" are so interested in the historical information then why are they not out there looking for it?
Instead, they would rather leave it buried and unseen?!
When I visit these battlefield sights all I see is GROUND! So what if the relics were removed. What difference, or impact, does it have on my visit?
NONE!
I get more excited visiting an antique shop that has relics on display!
Nobody thought or says anything about the "archies" digging up and destroying the original appearance of mound sites, pyramids, tombs, etc.
In the name of science?
I say BS!
It is so THEY can have their name associated with the find.
If a farmer picks up an arrowhead, or civil war relic, or Roman coin while plowing his fields, is he a felon and thief?
No wonder these days when someone FINDS something that they don't report it.
They would just have it taken away from them.
The "archies" have enough playgrounds to dig in.
And they would learn so much more by working with the detectorists instead of against.