Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

AT Pro in mineralized ground

wayne_etc

Member
Hey folks.

I've been considering picking up an AT Pro but I'm concerned about how it would perform in my highly mineralized sticky red clay.

Anyone used it in this kind of environment?


Thanks in advance.


w
 
Where I'm at the soil is moderate to highly mineralized. I haven't had a lot of experience (yet) but my AT-Pro seems to do pretty good. It ground balances in the upper 70's to low 80s. Previous to the ATP I had a Teknetics Delta 4000 with factory set GB. It didn't do very well here, at least in my opinion. Apparently highly mineralized soils are a challenge for most detectors to some extent.
 
Thank you sir. Exactly the type of info I was looking for.


w
 
it does a pretty good job. I live in Australia and we have some pretty harsh grounds here and the ATP handles it pretty well. I do have to turn down the sensitivity a little bit in the more dense areas to compensate for such conditions and you will loose some depth but that's a small price to pay for such an affordable and versatile machine. Running any machine on a single frequency (VLF) will always cause issues in heavy mineralization......... period! Manual ground balance is also your best friend in these type of conditions and the ATP does have that option :biggrin:
Cheers!
 
Wayne I live in North Georgia tons of red clay here and I think the AT Pro does better than any detector I have used in this soil! I am going to try and eventually get a AT-Gold which is supposed to handle bad soil a little better to use on Civil War relics they supposedly hit on lower conductors better to.
 
junior now you have me thinking about an at gold. all i do is relic hunt and i just used my nautilus today on a site i have been hitting all week with the at pro and i squeaked out about 6 poncho eyes and 4 small rivets. oh yea and 2 minie balls(they were pretty deep though so i dont blame the AT :D).

the way i look at it is that the at pro/gold were built to be used in creeks/streams and beaches. they both should be able to handle high mineralization to a certain extent. i cant vouch for the gold, but the at pro gets the job done here in VA
 
wayne_etc said:
Hey folks.

I've been considering picking up an AT Pro but I'm concerned about how it would perform in my highly mineralized sticky red clay.

Anyone used it in this kind of environment?


Thanks in advance.


w

I'll see your highly mineralized sticky red clay and raise you highly mineralized adobe with some black sand and volcanic debris thrown for the fun of it from Northern California. Nasty ground to hunt in with any metal detector. Got to cut through the mineralization to get the beeps. I've got a high end detector. Even adjusting it to optimum performance in my ground conditions, the AT Pro with the 5x8 coil attached does very well against it. I've hit solid coin targets at 8 inches and "iffies" deeper. It does what I had intended it to do and it does it very well. My ground VDIs anywhere from 85 to 92.
 
Great input.

Still hashing around which detector to get next. I'll be looking closer at the AT now.


w
 
I live in ohio and when i auto gb the at pro it hits 80 tp89 but still dpes a great job of it starts chattering i just change the freq
 
Hi Wayne,
I have both ATs and like the AT Gold with 5x8 coil for the trashy, highly mineralized conditions that I often hunt. If you're in gold country, the ATG will be a little more sensitive to small gold and has the ground balance window and more iron discrimination. That being said, 2 of the 3 larger nuggets that I found recently were found using the AT Pro. The AT Gold is also an excellent relic and coin shooter. Of course, if you plan to hunt freshwater beaches and creeks, either machine will serve you well, but the AT Gold is not recommended for salt water beaches (it's OK in the dry sand).
Best of luck!
 
I've had ground balancing numbers from 12 to 89 here and had few issues. Most I have had were do to trashy areas.
 
William-NM said:
Hi Wayne,
I have both ATs and like the AT Gold with 5x8 coil for the trashy, highly mineralized conditions that I often hunt. If you're in gold country, the ATG will be a little more sensitive to small gold and has the ground balance window and more iron discrimination. That being said, 2 of the 3 larger nuggets that I found recently were found using the AT Pro. The AT Gold is also an excellent relic and coin shooter. Of course, if you plan to hunt freshwater beaches and creeks, either machine will serve you well, but the AT Gold is not recommended for salt water beaches (it's OK in the dry sand).
Best of luck!


What happens to the AT Gold in salt water? Does is just go erratic? Is it of any use in such water?
 
I can't speak from experience - no salt water around me (darn!). Garrett doesn't recommend it for salt water use - I don't think it will ground balance. Others have said that it worked OK on the dry sand areas, though.
 
Here in mid-NY State, I hunt in ground at 89-94; the AT Pro does wonders.

aj
 
Top