Research is needed...
Yes, there would have to be a transmitter (Bluetooth adapter) plugged into the detector. Since the
detector hole is 1/4" while the Bluetooth adapter is 1/8" (3.5mm), a 3.5mm to 1/4" adapter would be needed
which would make the transmitter stick out quite a bit from the detector.
Bluetooth version 2.1 has a range of about 30 feet and is pretty stable. However, that version is only about
a year old, so one would have to make certain to use this newer version to optimize range and decrease
outside interferences. The older versions were not as stable, often times had distance and interference problems.
A newer version 3.0 is due out (may be available now) soon and promises to be better yet.
I think Bluetooth headphones would be wonderful. I foresee various high end detectors will be Bluetooth enabled
and certified for use by the Bluetooth SIG (special interest group) in the near future. I have
read about one unit so far, made in (I believe) France. If they get it right...
Maybe I'll' be able to use a detector while listening to Pink Floyd as my background noise.
In conclusion... my memory is failing right along side of my hearing and eyesight. So, if you really want to know
the truth... Google "Bluetooth" and read all about what I've forgotten to mention or lied about
Regards,
Doc