You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
I a thr said:Del, I have been experimenting by spraying my coil covers. I have just been watching it for durability. After a year it is holding very well. I got the spray can from a local auto parts store and seems like it was about $8.00 and have used it on several coil covers and also on the handle of my Preditor digging shovel. It looks good and seems to be holding well on it also.
Bill
dahut said:For the price of the spray, it seems you are not in any better situation than with a commercial cover. And the spray is pretty much permanent - if something goes awry, whatever that might be, you are 'stuck' with that stuff on there. Only surgery will remove it, right?
The one time I think it is a good solution is at the marine shore. A sealed, damage proof coating is probably good insurance in the sand.
And since the used detector buyer was mentioned, I'll say that as a buyer of used detectors, I would be suspicious and certainly put off, by the spray-on stuff. And I buy several used detectors, each year.
With a cover, I can remove it and inspect the coil. When I sell it, so can my buyer. You cannot say that with the spray on stuff.
It's like this: people want to look; it's part of horse trading. So I say make it possible for them to do it, and keep the sale smooth. A cover for a few bucks ensures that.
The one drawback to plastic covers is they need to be cleaned out now and then. Hey, nuttin' is perfect!
I used to be fastidious about coil covers, then I got to where Monte is. It 'aint really the big deal we like to make of it, but I go ahead and use covers. But hey, if sprayin' on some goop makes you happy, then have at it!
dahut said:For the price of the spray, it seems you are not in any better situation than with a commercial cover. And the spray is pretty much permanent - if something goes awry, whatever that might be, you are 'stuck' with that stuff on there. Only surgery will remove it, right?
The one time I think it is a good solution is at the marine shore. A sealed, damage proof coating is probably good insurance in the sand.
And since the used detector buyer was mentioned, I'll say that as a buyer of used detectors, I would be suspicious and certainly put off, by the spray-on stuff. And I buy several used detectors, each year.
With a cover, I can remove it and inspect the coil. When I sell it, so can my buyer. You cannot say that with the spray on stuff.
It's like this: people want to look; it's part of horse trading. So I say make it possible for them to do it, and keep the sale smooth. A cover for a few bucks ensures that.
The one drawback to plastic covers is they need to be cleaned out now and then. Hey, nuttin' is perfect!
I used to be fastidious about coil covers, then I got to where Monte is. It 'aint really the big deal we like to make of it, but I go ahead and use covers. But hey, if sprayin' on some goop makes you happy, then have at it!
dahut said:Are we talking about spraying the whole coil, or just a removable cover? If the latter, then it really seems pointless, unless you want to keep a $5 cover looking good.
If the former, then I really am suspicious. I have seen coils develop cracks, not at the connector but at the point where the halves are joined. With todays epoxy filled coils, it seems even less of an issue. So we cover the bottom with gunk, then what?
Aside from the cost, what does this liner spray help? I do see the money advantage in the spray, as long as the can remains usable. I mean, you know how those things clog up if they sit too long.
So, other than to protect the coil bottom and sides from scuffs and scrapes - a job which a cover can do as well - is it just the frugal, DIY nature of this modification that appeals?
(Marine expoxy coating aside; that I get..... no cover - no entrapped sand to cause problems, etc.)
Maybe we need a survey: What do people buying the detector after you've slathered liner goop on it have to say? Now I'm curious....
See ,that makes good sense. I get that totally.Neil said:Dave for me using the spray on liner its a good idea because I mostly beach hunt and the coil covers gotta come off after every hunt as its always loaded with sand and some moisture from the surf.
See, now THAT is what I didn't get. I was thinking along the lines of the really thick stuff I see on truck beds, the 2mm thick stuff. Now that is really "goop." Thin like paint was not what I was envisioning.Also the bed liner spray is thin enough where you can put a coil cover on if that's your preference. This is not frugal, nor is it sloop or goop.... and the coating is just a tad thicker than paint.
It's not looking for anything in particular, although that is part of any inspection. Rather it is more like having the option to inspect, vice having that option eliminated, or covered over, if you prefer....inspecting the coil as you say, don't know what you think your seeing, its really the cable you should be concerned about. Ive got a couple of old coils that are beat to hell, the cable is fine and they work great but to look at them, well you would probably run from them
I wasn't clear here - sorry. It's not that I am suspicious of the seller, or any of my fellow detectorists, for that matter. Most guys I've dealt with are both honest and determined, and they wouldn't do this unless they thought it was of some value. Rather, I am suspicious of modifications, generally, until I fully understand them....so you don't have to be suspicious of a coated coil, I think most of us on the forums are honest.