Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

All these E-Trac air tests are somewhat interesting, but in the real world they are totally worthless!!

Bart

New member
None of the air tests take into account iron corrosion, soil moisture, soil mineralization, coin position, coin metal leaching, 3 dimensional depth of the trash items, and soil composition, to name a few. No one ever encounters a target scene that even comes close to the flat, surface, one dimensional scenario that all these air tests are set up for. What kind of conclusions could you possibly draw from a situation that does not exist in the real MD'ing world? The results of an air test can not possibly be extrapolated to represent a completely different set of circumstances under several inches of ground. Just yesterday I saw a penny laying on top of the ground. My SE made not a sound when I passed the coil over it. Only when I switched to all metal did it "see" the penny. Should I conclude from this that the SE can't run a disc. program and find pennies too?
Of course not...This was an "on the fly air test" The SE failed miserably on it !!!!. But surface pennies don't interest me much. Besides I can see them. I have dug many pennies from less that 1/2" to over 8" deep with lots of disc. The only test that matters is the "ground" test. The E-Trac may rule the air........but the Explorer rules the ground.
 
The E-Trac may rule the air........but the Explorer rules the ground.

Maybe the E Trac rules both the air and the ground.... we don't know yet do we? I hope each machine will have it's strengths and that they will complement each other.

I don't have an E Trac yet but I have an SE... E Trac is coming later this week. I will be using both of them, time will tell.


J
 
I hadn't thought of that, maybe we'll see some post with that set up. That would still be fascinating even if it weren't perfect, still be interesting. Inquiring minds want to know.
 
Bart said:
None of the air tests take into account iron corrosion, soil moisture, soil mineralization, coin position, coin metal leaching, 3 dimensional depth of the trash items, and soil composition, to name a few. No one ever encounters a target scene that even comes close to the flat, surface, one dimensional scenario that all these air tests are set up for. What kind of conclusions could you possibly draw from a situation that does not exist in the real MD'ing world? The results of an air test can not possibly be extrapolated to represent a completely different set of circumstances under several inches of ground. Just yesterday I saw a penny laying on top of the ground. My SE made not a sound when I passed the coil over it. Only when I switched to all metal did it "see" the penny. Should I conclude from this that the SE can't run a disc. program and find pennies too?
Of course not...This was an "on the fly air test" The SE failed miserably on it !!!!. But surface pennies don't interest me much. Besides I can see them. I have dug many pennies from less that 1/2" to over 8" deep with lots of disc. The only test that matters is the "ground" test. The E-Trac may rule the air........but the Explorer rules the ground.

Absolutely right, however if it can't detect a coin between iron targets in the air it sure isn't going to do it in the ground unless its an old copper or bronze coin, as for silver and gold coins they do not leach anything. what sort of penny was yous? as new UK pennies post 2000 are mostly ferrous and will actually stick to magnet, so I would expect them to disc out when using an iron disc pattern. have got or tried an E-Track?

As most veteran detectors will agree for the past 30 years we have all carried out free in the air tests to give an indication of the detectors capabilities, and one thing this has pr oven over the years is that if the machine performance is poor in the air, then its going to be just as poor in the ground.
 
And I believe Rigit touched on them. Its virtually impossible to recreate an in-ground test bed to include all the factors and combinations you mention. The air test seems to give us a simple indication of what the machine can do and folks are mixing the angles of the targets, adding junk, black sand, hot rocks, etc. If a machine won't detect a dime at 4" in the air then there is no reason it should find it at 8" in the ground as far as I'm concerned. The various air tests we've do have value added esp when done side by side with an Explorer. Many so far have simply been to see approx where things read on the ET. As far as your statement about the Exp ruling the ground and the ET the air - I don't see that you've produced any evidence of this whatsoever and I highly doubt it's the case.
 
Ask any longtime Explorer user how well his machine picks up targets in an already dug hole, or with loose dirt in it. I've done it myself many times. I've located a target 8" deep using some disc., and when I've dug out 6" worth of dirt, and scan the coil over the hole....nothing....not a sound...until I go all metal. Using a coin disc. pattern causes the Explorers to often times lose the target in the hole....I've been using my SE for two years now, so I do have some experience with this machine. I have also seen a few others say the very same thing. I am not repeating what they have said...I speak from experience. Not knocking the Explorers....I have an SE and love it...just saying the Explorers in particular behave quite differently in air as opposed to the real world ground conditions. So anticipating ground performance, from an air test is pointless. Metal detectors are designed to find targets in the ground not in the air. My Whites 6000 DI Pro analog machine will smoke both of the Explorers put up against it in an air test. Any US coin I have tried can be hit from 2-3" farther away with the ancient 6000. But in the ground.....no contest. I have never found a target deeper than 6' with my 6000.
 
I think you are right Rigit, that if a machine couldn't pick the coin out next to the iron in the air it would be harder for it to do in ground for the iron has a heck of a large halo in comparison to any coin. Twice this week I dug out large nails, pulling them straight out of the side of the hole and when I went back in with the probe I could still pick up the rusty iron particles still around where the nail used to be. Next coin you pull out in the same manner, try and pick up it's halo in the soil it was sitting in, I have never been able to do it, but I have done it many times with iron. I am going to make less friends with this next statement, in that, I do not believe silver leeches out of any silver coin enough to increase it's signal because it's halo would be too small and on copper coins; that green crud is literally doubling the surface area of the coin and also leeching some into the soil while pitting is falling out. As for nails and iron in general, not only do they leech massively in comparison to coins but again the corrosion is doubling and tripling, possibly quadrupling their surface area. Don't believe me, how many pitted silver coins have you dug lately?? But I think Bart has a point to be taken quite seriously in that if you were swinging over a nail at 3 inches deep (which would give a much larger signal) and then right after a coin at 7 inches, which not only be a smaller signal to begin with on a level playing field, but now that it's twice the distance from the coil, it's signal is probably now minute in comparison. Nothing like guessing which color the invisible ghost is. That maybe the largest argument for the air tests being very inaccurate, when the iron nail is out of the ground without it's leeched rust halo, it's signal is going to be much smaller then in ground, haloed, and many of these tests that work above ground won't mean much once the nail is haloed in ground and those same results will no longer work in ground. I think that's why we need appreciable moisture to get real depth on silver. The iron has a tremendous advantage in signal size and when the soil gets wet; it, in itself, carries the much smaller signal of the silver further then it would in dry non conductive ground. Add salt, and it's even more conductive. Ever make a battery in school and add salt to the water and watch the light bulb light where water itself couldn't carry the charge and the second you stirred in the salt, it lit up nice and bright? But not only is moisture increasing the distance of the silver signal "carrying" but it is also doing the same for the iron signal, even more so. If the silver had a signal "size or strength" value of 3 and the iron a value of 6 and moisture doubles the value of the silver but triples the conductance value of the iron, the silver value is now (2x3) 6; and the iron's now is (3x6) or 18. So at that time, a smaller coil would need to both be able to fit in between the two pieces of iron, not having their stronger signals interfere with the detection of the silver but also have to be able to carry the 7 inches of depth necessary to pick out the coin at 7 inches deep, where the week before, when the soil was dryer, you couldn't reach the silver because you would have needed a larger coil to get 7 inches depth and maybe the larger coil is now too large to achieve the separation needed between the two nails and the machine then nulls out, because it never picks up the minute signal of the silver coin in size comparison too the two nail's combined signal together. But there may be a tiny exact spot where the coil in that exact spot can receive just enough to give a peep, but with discrimination, the strength of the return signal may be too small for the machine to report over the null. That signal may never be heard in discrimination. That's what all metal does, the machine reports everything, not just if it is larger than the null or everything else, just if it's larger than the threshold setting, which means it can be much smaller and still be heard. Sometimes that signal is equal to the threshold level and the threshold will blank alerting you to a vary small or deep signal. How can you tell your threshold is "blanking" if you are in discrimination? It would just sound like a null. That's what gain is supposed to do, to "boost" the strength of the signal higher than the threshold but again the machine is deciding this for you. Most of this software that does all this "compare and decide", you could do in half the time with your ears. All these discrimination filters, and if/then filters turn the signal into a rumor and each filter is a new person it has to pass through, by the time it gets around the room, it does not resemble the original and the information is wrong, sometimes opposite from it's original form. I want my all metal, ML. See how I took your air test post and turned it into an all metal plea.:rofl: I have a disease apparently. By the way if anyone doesn't agree with what I posted and/or it doesn't make sense, either you're not smart enough or I just made it up as I went along.:crazy:
 
In that scenario, the wet ground might easily carry the signal twice as far than any type of air could. Plus the ground has conductive metals and salts in it trillions times more than air. And you are also forgetting that the machine is doing a math calculation based on the difference between the coin's value and what is "surrounding it" and that math is based on different soil values which no where near match the airs value. The whole thing is If x= this and y = this then do this. It is a calculation based on expected values and air is not in there. Yes, even the worst soil is more conductive than air.
 
The machine is reacting many times in a way that you can see. Example the video where changing the direction of the nails effecting the result, unless I could see the nails and the coins, I would have never known that would react that way. And the other test where the signal sounded off a foot left of the coin, I did not realize that iron could cause that signal "drift" to that degree. So why don't you guys stop arguing and get together and invent some invisible dirt or invent a way to be able to "see" the coils signals. But seriously, air tests can give a great deal of info as long as you take them with a grain of salt. The machine still will process signals in the air, but the math is off and so will the results to a degree, but you might learn a few generalities that would be very educational by fooling around with this. I am all for watching, how bout you guys? This is fun.:lol:
 
I've been using an Explorer since 2000 and I've never really seen a case where it won't pick up the coin, but I have an X-1 and a VibraProbe so I don't scan piles of dirt too often with the big coil. If you saw my post a few weeks ago I found a silver dime that was cut into three pieces. The two smaller pieces were appox 1/5th of the total of the dime. I dropped one of the small pieces in the grass and had to find it with the main coil because it was so small! The ProCoil had absolutely no problem picking up the tiny piece of silver in the grass! I have no doubt that the E-Trac is going to be a better Explorer than the Explorer. I consider it the E-Trac a logical evolution of the Explorer - they can call it what they want, but it's just a better Explorer - it ain't that different an animal.
 
Quote .... Yes, even the worst soil is more conductive than air.

I'm pretty sure you meant to say ... even the most neutral soil is more conductive than air ... right ?

Not trying to be a smart aleck ... just want to be clear on what you're posting.

Also consider this, heavy iron mineral content ( in soil ) can actually help man made iron objects like nails etc. stand out better.

Where I live the iron ore is so thick that I can drag a magnet across the surface and load it up with it, in ground nails and such are still very easy to discern among disireable targets too, granted I run with max sound variation and nothing less !

Silver and gold for the most part doesn't leach into the soil like iron, copper or brass but I have dug MANY silver coins that were totally BLACK with oxidation and that DOES affect the signal boost.

Mike
 
Sounds like your soil is so irony, that you are picking up the soil itself, in fact, all soils contain more metals than air because metal is heavier than air and 4 billion years of gravity has and is doing a very effective job of pulling them to the ground out of the air. The reason a compass works is because of the fluid iron core of our planet, and the magnetic poles, which themselves are a form of electrical and magnetic currents. On the silver oxidation, I am not sure the silver is broken down and leaching out into the soil as much as something else is attaching itself to the coin and then giving an extra chemical compound, maybe more conductive surface material to the coin for the detector to pick up as well as the silver. When it is removed, I rarely see any damage to the coin itself. It's been 25 years since chemistry.:lol: But I am pretty sure in terms of stability of metals breaking down it would go from least to worst in the same order of preciousness, platinum, gold, silver, bronze, copper, iron. I am not sure if copper and bronze are reversed, but I think that list is right. The lower on the list, the more susceptible to breaking down and leaching, and the larger the halo effect. And yes the conductive order of the metals listed may indeed be different or not, I don't remember, but I am talking about the ability to produce an "in ground halo" from metal leeching out into the soil around the coin. Certain salts, lime, calcites and other minerals and acids would speed that up a little, but not to the point that the order of that list would change. The coins
 
SO I guess the recovery speed that mlotv did is worthless also. I believe that was done in the air
 
Air does ot conduct current until it becomes ionized by reaching the breakdown field strength. After that you get "arcing" (Lightening is such a result). Wet ground is generally conductive because of the effect of ground mineralization..

HH,
Glenn
 
that's what I am saying, we are not testing in air that is conductive so there is no way it could compare to a test in soil that is much more conductive.
 
If the ETrac shows faster recovery in the air, from that, one would assume that it should faster recover in the soil as long as the two machines have at least equal ability to deal with mineralisation and I would not think that ML would have put out a machine upgrade that would be a step backwards in dealing with mineralisation.
 
Top