You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Wow! First time I've heard that there was that big a difference. Thanks.khouse said:I've had both and the 305 is a huge upgrade. GB, Volume contol, noise cancel, different frequency depending on coils, better balanced, huge display, threshold adjustment, different tones and modulated target response just to name a few. The 250 is a great little machine but the 305 eats it's lunch.
That's what I'm gonna do. It's a strange situation. I went out with a fairly deep machine-my Silver umax and realized that in my area and my sites there is so much large iron near the surface that depth is not my problem. And it's all within a 60 mile radius! I really don't have any open, clean sites. The fact that I can turn the sensitivity down FURTHER with my Ace than any detector I own makes it a must in my part of East Texas. After going over the same site with my Ace at 3 bars sensitivity, I was amazed at how quite it was compared to the constant signaling I was getting from a deeper detector. At 4 bars, it starts signaling like the others=with jumping icons all over the id. I further realized this when a detecorist with the 11" coil came to me for help-he couldn't even use the coil!Mtnmn said:If you are now getting great results with the Ace, why not stick with it. If later on you want better results and don't already have a larger DD coil on your Ace, get one and go from there. Like already mentioned you can always up-grade in the future to a used AT-Pro or XT-705, if needed.
And ain't it a peculiar thing?I've seen others with really nice machines throw up their hands and if they're new in the hobby just quit because they thought the higher priced machines were gonna make them rich-my area is history rich. I've also seen huge holes dug to get one of these signals-in the middle of a tot lot!Mtnmn said:I have lots of ground like that here in PA (loaded with iron) and while having a detector with ground balancing capabilities is a definite plus, cutting back on your sensitivity is one of the best ways to handle iron saturated areas. That and if depth and coverage isn't an issue, a sniper coil can work exceptionally well in such areas too. Although something a little larger than Garrett's 4.5" sniper coil would probably be more ideal because of the extra depth and coverage it would provide, while still maintaining great separation ability.