Got my ACE 350 couple of weeks ago - first detector I have owned and I am pretty happy with it so far - easy to use - easy pinpoint.
I have been hunting some old house sites and old fields - I have found plenty of clad, but no older coins as of yet.
I think the double d does a fine job with the mineralization and separation - but I have this nagging feeling that older coins are eluding me because I dint have a
ground balance. You would think with 2 older home sites and a couple of old farmer fields turned into parks - would produce older coins.
I know the ACE 350 is touted as more of a relic hunter - but it seems to hit clad ok at 4-8 inches. So.. the question is - would a detector with ground balance really help me find older coins better? - Like.. $400-$500 dollars better ???
Also wondering what other ACE 350 users in red clay have experienced in finding older coins.
Thanks in advance for the response
I have been hunting some old house sites and old fields - I have found plenty of clad, but no older coins as of yet.
I think the double d does a fine job with the mineralization and separation - but I have this nagging feeling that older coins are eluding me because I dint have a
ground balance. You would think with 2 older home sites and a couple of old farmer fields turned into parks - would produce older coins.
I know the ACE 350 is touted as more of a relic hunter - but it seems to hit clad ok at 4-8 inches. So.. the question is - would a detector with ground balance really help me find older coins better? - Like.. $400-$500 dollars better ???
Also wondering what other ACE 350 users in red clay have experienced in finding older coins.
Thanks in advance for the response