Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

About Channels... From Minelab

A

Anonymous

Guest
<i>I wrote Minelab and asked about channels. I bolded the most important part of the message. Here is the response....</i>
Thank you for your questions. I understand your confusion and will try to explain what is happening.
As you know, when the Explorer is operating, it is scanning in 28 frequencies. These frequencies are linked to each other by a number. People used to Physics or Maths would call these numbers 'fundamental frequencies' and what we commonly call frequencies they would call 'harmonics'. To give you an simplified example that shows this ( the real numbers are a lot more complex), lets say that the fundamental frequency number were 1.5 then the frequencies or harmonics might be 1.5; 3; 4.5; 6; 7.5; etc, if the fundamental frequency number were changed to 1.4 then the harmonics might be 1.4; 2.8; 4.2; 5.6; 7; etc and if the fundamental frequency were 1.6 then the harmonics would be extrapolated from there.
When you do a noise cancel, the detector scanns through a series of fundamental frequency combinations to choise the set of harmonics that are the least effected by other interferance in the area. Likewise when you manually select a channel, your just selecting a combination of frequencies that will be the most stable.
Please disreguard the numbers used above, I only used simple numbers like that to make it easy to understand, in actual fact the numbers are a lot more complex but the important thing you need to understand is the the degree of movement between the fundamental frequencies used in each of the channels is very minute and <b>in no way would it cause your detector to be more stronger in depth or sensitivity in one channel or another.</b> The only difference you'll notice will be that some will be more quiet than others in certain environments on certain days.
 
Tim, I suppose they know what they are talking about, but assuming one channel is quieter than another, I would also assume you would get better performance from the quieter channel. If in fact its falsing on one, you will be sure to have a harder time hearing a deep target, thus one channel performs better than another. Some have posted that they feel one particular channel performs better than the others, well maybe thats the channel with the least noise in their area.. If this is the case then it is possible that this was a well meant myth, even if it indeed is a myth
 
Jim -
I am not trying to dispel myths or anything... I just wanted to know what the heck it actually did! <IMG SRC="/forums/images/biggrin.gif" BORDER=0 ALT=":D">
Personally, I have a feeling that Channel 5 was selected as a default for SOME reason, you know what I mean. And I agree with you, a particular channel may be better for some people for some reason.
Several times I have manually scanned all of the channels. Thus far, I have yet to find any given one noisier than another. Then again, I tend to hunt in fairly rural areas. And personally, I am sticking with the default channel unless it is generating noise - might as well play the odds since it doesn't much matter otherwise <IMG SRC="/forums/images/smile.gif" BORDER=0 ALT=":)">
Tim
 
Top