A
Anonymous
Guest
Hi All:
I was just wondering about something... I've been going over the old posts while I wait for my C$ to get here, and I found a really interesting one by Mike Hillis from about a month ago... The post I'm referring to is:
Bill, I have got a different approach
Posted By: Mike Hillis
Date: Wednesday, 16 March 2005, at 5:10 p.m.
Mike had talked about how he was planning on using the threshold to help regulate the trash signals for jewelry hunting.... for example
<EM>"By lowering the threshold settings to the point to where the micro alum and odd shaped trash won't register, the solid ring hits will come in nice and solid. I'm thinking settings like 270 or even 180 in combination with a 75 iron disc range. Add to this the unique CS feature of raising numbers on low conductive targets at distance, it will be easy to eliminate the larger trash by how far up number wise it will go when raising the coil."</EM>
Mike, I was wondering if you (or anyone else) had a chance to try those settings out... does it work? It seems like it should, but the C$ also seems to be a little finicky at times.
Does anyone else have any settings that are working well for jewelry in the trash? (I think I've dug eighteen bazillion pulltabs in my life (with other detectors) and only one gold ring... I'd LOVE to figure out a way to increase the chances a bit.)
Thanks to all
BG
I was just wondering about something... I've been going over the old posts while I wait for my C$ to get here, and I found a really interesting one by Mike Hillis from about a month ago... The post I'm referring to is:
Bill, I have got a different approach
Posted By: Mike Hillis
Date: Wednesday, 16 March 2005, at 5:10 p.m.
Mike had talked about how he was planning on using the threshold to help regulate the trash signals for jewelry hunting.... for example
<EM>"By lowering the threshold settings to the point to where the micro alum and odd shaped trash won't register, the solid ring hits will come in nice and solid. I'm thinking settings like 270 or even 180 in combination with a 75 iron disc range. Add to this the unique CS feature of raising numbers on low conductive targets at distance, it will be easy to eliminate the larger trash by how far up number wise it will go when raising the coil."</EM>
Mike, I was wondering if you (or anyone else) had a chance to try those settings out... does it work? It seems like it should, but the C$ also seems to be a little finicky at times.
Does anyone else have any settings that are working well for jewelry in the trash? (I think I've dug eighteen bazillion pulltabs in my life (with other detectors) and only one gold ring... I'd LOVE to figure out a way to increase the chances a bit.)
Thanks to all
BG