You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
ExpIInut said:No problem with those sort of targets BUT the i.d given by the machine can be very poor on some of the slightly deeper ones - any target, and by that I do mean any, that will not lock on and jumps from ZERO to about 12/16 with both iron grunt and high tone is worth investigating if you have the time - you will also find with this machine that a good signal can turn into an iron tone once the target is out of the ground - when this happens I know I'm looking for something very small in the spoil heap - bit long winded but hope this helps - Gaz in UK.
ExpIInut said:Sounds like the way I hunt - Relic - zero disc - trigger central - then set threshold so its smooth and stable I've found it doesn't matter how loud or quiet you have it - gb on track flick the trigger forward wind up the gain and put up with the noise.
Larry (IL) said:The 6X10 will serve your needs well for that just don't expect the same depth as the 950 or D2. The 6X10 should have similar depth of a 6" coil with good separation but the coverage of a 10" coil, a specialty coil. Bird shot is often used as a test target for gold nuggets in prospecting mode. If you are expecting more sensitivity to smaller targets, you will have to go to a smaller coil like the 4X6.
plidn1 said:We have tested the 6 X 10 against the 5.3 with 2 different MXT's and found that it is an inferior coil. The 5.3 out performs it hands down in all but the most "HOT" of ground.
In the prospect mode, check your ground reading. If your ground reads under 80, the 5.3 will serve you much better.
It pin points like a rifle shot and will get you depth like you can't believe. More so then the 6 x 10.
plidn1 said:My soil in the area's I work are between 57 and 75.
The test area of the 6 x 10 was in the 70 + range. The 6 X 10 would only find targets up to 4 1/2 " while the 5.3 was finding targets in the 6 to 7" depth with both detectors in the same soccer field.
I use the 5.3 for 95% of my hunting. We were trying to find a little larger coil to use in place of the 5.3 for nugget shooting.
Needless to say, we had already had the best. The 5.3 is a 6 3/4" coil so you don't gain but very little coverage with the 6 X 10, but you lose the sensitivity and depth of the concentric.
This test was performed in C&J mode, at preset gain, which I always hunt at, and discrimination set between 1 and 2.
plidn1 said:That was the first thing I noticed when I put the 6x10 on the detector. How much heaver it was over the 5.3.
I have not wanted to get out to the gold fields with it yet. I am finding way too much gold in the local parks to justify burning the gas to get to the gold country.
But I have found close to 300 rings with it along with many pendants and chains both gold and silver. Not all the rings were gold and silver. Maybe 1/2 of them.
I just found, in the last hour, a .9 gram 14 K pendant. Made my day.
You can believe me when I say it's whites secret weapon.
plidn1 said:That was the first thing I noticed when I put the 6x10 on the detector. How much heaver it was over the 5.3.
I have not wanted to get out to the gold fields with it yet. I am finding way too much gold in the local parks to justify burning the gas to get to the gold country.
But I have found close to 300 rings with it along with many pendants and chains both gold and silver. Not all the rings were gold and silver. Maybe 1/2 of them.
I just found, in the last hour, a .9 gram 14 K pendant. Made my day.
You can believe me when I say it's whites secret weapon.
nevadamxt said:truthfully i have never been impressed with the 6x9-10 ? as far as i know the shape of the probe (magnetic part underground) is more knife shaped than a concentric coil and i will say it can seperate targets extremly well but has very limited depth .i have two of them and there both the same .i have never found anything over probably 4 " s deep at best with it but have come back with a 300 coil and found stuff at a much deeper depth .were kinda talking apples to oranges though i have never tried a 5.3 although i plan on getting one soon and a 950 ymmv