Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

3d / 70

A

Anonymous

Guest
Darn it, spring is here and I am still procrastinating and my wife is ready to divorce me or kill me because I cannot make up my mind.
I keep going back and forth between the 3d and 70.
Yes, I will be doing older parks and older homes and some newer parks and fresh water beaches.
Please save a marriage and give me your thoughts and preferences one more time.
Thank you on advance.
P.S. If you dont here from me anymore tell the police that my wife did it.
 
I too was thinking about a new detector...you see I have a 3d and it is very deep but like NASA TOM says not really intended for newer hunts. I used it anyway and found some deep old coins. But was missing what my DFX use to do. It found clusters of coins and rings and jewlery. The DFX had no depth but boy did it make up for it on the shallow stuff. One year I found over a thousand dollars in coins and the next year close to two thousand that is a lot of coins.
So I got the Troy X5 no tones no depth reading no meter and man was I unhappy. I hated it!
So I sent it back and did some reading about the fisher CZ line and after a lot of reading and a lot of help from this forum I got the CZ70 pro four tones and gave it a test and it was like my DFX bt with the depth of the 3D. I was blown away how easy it was to set up and I found a lot of rings and jewlery my first day out and I found a lot of cluster coins.
I now have to have the 3Z take a break and use it for its high tone on older coins and gold coins.
It is a different machine and a great machine but if I had to have one it would be the CZ70 and I have used all the top of the line detectors. I have a few of my finds under Lawrenzo
 
I have both and a C$ to boot. I use my C$ for older sites and it is slightly better in iron trash other than that it's all CZ70. I liked my 3D but at the end of the day it was still a CZ and I already had one. At old sites I dig the mid tones on my 70 anyway so I haven't seen the 3D benefits. Also in my coin garden there is no difference in depth. I do love the sensitivity knob adjustment on the 3D. I've said it before, If I could have only one....CZ70!
 
I would advise you to visit a Fisher dealer to see them first hand...Also the Fisher site explains their abilities..Both have the same depth and stability and a winner whichever you choose...
 
They are not the same unit, with one being digital and the other being analog. The 70 pro uses a different chasis than any analog version, and is deeper. As far as old coins, if you are finding old stuff, you dig some of the trash. My brother made off with my 6a, so I've just replaced it with the 70pro.
I told Fisher to take the 70 pro, and change the bias
like they did on the 3D, and call it the CZ EXTREME.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top